期刊文献+

等级记分模型下几种等值方法的比较研究 被引量:2

Comparison Study of Several Equating Methods under Grade Response Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 等值对考试具有重要意义,而我国的大部分考试却没有实现等值,在少数经过等值的考试中,大多只限于对二级记分题目的等值,鲜有对多级记分题目的等值研究。该研究针对包含多级记分题目的国内某大型语言类考试,探讨了等级反应模型下的同时校准法、固定共同题参数法以及链接独立校准法中的平均数标准差方法、平均数平均数方法、Haebara法和Stocking-Lord法六种等值方法的效果,从而优选最适合该考试的等值方法。 To equating tests is very important,but most of the tests are not equating in China.The tests which equating are only contain the dichotomous items in domestic but not the polychromous items.This study is choosing the best equivalent method for a large-scale language test which included polychromous items,and discussing the effect of those equivalent methods: Concurrent calibration, Fixed common item parameters, Linking separate calibration(Mean/Sigma,Mean/Mean Haebara and Stocking-Lord), under the Grade Response Model.
出处 《中国考试》 2013年第6期10-17,共8页 journal of China Examinations
关键词 等值 多级记分 跨样本 Equating Polychromous Items Cross-sample
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1韩宁.应用项目反应理论等值含有多种题型考试的一个实例[J].中国考试,2008(7):3-8. 被引量:4
  • 2谢小庆.对15种测验等值方法的比较研究[J].心理学报,2000,32(2):217-223.
  • 3周骏,欧东明,徐淑媛,戴海琦,漆书青.等级反应模型下项目特征曲线等值法在大型考试中的应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(6):832-838. 被引量:9
  • 4Brennan, R. L,(Ed.). Educational measurement (4th ed), Westport:American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers. 2006.
  • 5Dorans,N.J., & Holland,P.W. Population invariance and the equat-ability of tests:Basic theory and the linear case. Journal of Educa-tional Measurement, 2000. 37(4):281 - 306.
  • 6Dorans,N.J.,Holland,P.W.,Thayer,D.T., & Tateneni,K. Invarianceof scoring across gender groups for three Advanced Placement Pro-gram examinations.In NJ.Dorans,(Ed.),Population invariance ofscore linking:Theory and applications to advanced placement pro-gram examinations. ETS RR-03-27.2003:79-118.
  • 7Haebara’T. Equating logistic ability scales by a weighted leastsquares. Japanese Psychological Research, 1980.22:144-149.
  • 8Holland, P. W., & Rubin, D.B .(Ed.). Test equating, New York: Ac-ademic Press. 1982.
  • 9Loyd,B-H.,&Hoover,H.D. Vertical equating using the Rasch model.Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980.17:179-193.
  • 10Marco,G.L. Item characteristic curve solutions to three intractabletesting problems Journal of Educational Measurement, 1977. 14:139-160.

二级参考文献10

  • 1戴海崎.等级反应模型项目特征曲线法等值研究[J].心理学探新,2000,20(3):49-53. 被引量:4
  • 2谢小庆.对15种测验等值方法的比较研究[J].心理学报,2000,32(2):217-223.
  • 3W J Van der Linden, Ronald K. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Hambleton Eds, 1995
  • 4Kim S H, Cohen A S. A minimum method for Equating Tests under the Graded Response Model Applied Psychological Measurement,1995,19:167 ~ 176
  • 5Baker F B. Equating Tests under the Graded Response Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1992,16:87 ~ 96
  • 6Kolen M J, Brennan R L. Test equating methods and practices.New York: Springer, 1995
  • 7Harwell M R. Analyzing the results of Monte Carlo Studies in Item Response Theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement,1997 ,57(2) :266 ~279.
  • 8Eiji M, Darreli B. Parscale Manual Scientific Software Internation, Inc. 1997
  • 9Massachusetts Department of Edcuation.2005 MCAS technical re- port[]..2005
  • 10朱正才,杨惠中,杨浩然.Rasch模型在CET考试分数等值中的应用[J].现代外语,2003,26(1):69-75. 被引量:18

共引文献24

同被引文献15

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部