期刊文献+

Asymmetry in Value Relevance of Environmental Performance (EP) Information: Contingency Effects of Size and Industry

Asymmetry in Value Relevance of Environmental Performance (EP) Information: Contingency Effects of Size and Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Contemporary research documents a positive but weak price premium from environmental performance (EP). The specific circumstances of pricing EP of large and small companies and in polluting and clean industries have not, however, been investigated. This study predicts that financial markets price EP beyond financial fundamentals differently, depending on company size and the environmental risk of the industry and provides evidence relying on a set of the Sweden Stock Market 300 (SIX 300) companies listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange (OMX Stockholm). Applying a value relevance model, the average results are in line with previous findings that EP adds value beyond the book value of equity and earnings. The asymmetry in EP is, however, driven by company size and the environmental risk of the industry. This study suggests that large companies in low-risk industries obtain strong price premiums from being environmental industry leaders. In contrast, small companies and also companies in high-risk industries do not necessarily accrue the same market benefits.
出处 《Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing》 2013年第6期777-789,共13页 现代会计与审计(英文版)
关键词 environmental performance (EP) market premium industry risk SIZE moderated regression analysis (MRA) 不对称性 行业 EP 价值 环境绩效 斯德哥尔摩 环境风险 信息
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Aiken, L., & West, S. (199 l). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage Publications.
  • 2Aragon-Correa, J., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & Garcia-Morales, V. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88-103.
  • 3Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., & Walker, J. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting and Finance, 50(1), 31-51.
  • 4Beaver, W. (2002). Perspectives on recent capital market research. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 453-474.
  • 5Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006a). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435-455.
  • 6Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006b). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(7-8), 1168-1188.
  • 7Cambra-Fierro, J., Hart, S., & Polo-Redonto, Y. (2008). Environmental respect: Ethics or simply business? A study in the small and medium enterprise (SME) context. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 645-656.
  • 8Cameron, C., & Trivedi, E (2005). Micro econometrics, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 33(4), 303-327.
  • 10Clarkson, E, Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. (2011). Does it pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122-144.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部