建设性争辩、团队情绪对团队成员创新行为影响实证研究被引量：2

An Experimental Research on the Impact of Constructive Controversy,Workgroup Emotion on Innovation Behavior of Team Member

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过情景实验,对建设性争辩、团队情绪与团队成员创新行为之间的互动影响和调节效应进行了实证研究。HLM研究结果显示:团队积极情绪有利于个体创新,而团队消极情绪对创新行为影响并不显著;建设性争辩在创新想法产生和创新行为实现过程中发挥了积极作用;团队积极情绪在建设性争辩与个体创新行为之间发挥正向调节作用,团队消极情绪在建设性争辩与个体创新行为之间产生负向调节影响。营造积极的团队情绪氛围,培养良好的情绪体验,引导和发挥建设性争辩的积极作用,能够将情商教育与创新教育有机融合,提高创新能力。 This study investigated the innovation behavior of team member in real practical training to examine the interac- tive effect among constructive controversy, workgroup emotion and innovation behavior. The HLM result showed that positive workgroup emotion has a effect on innovative behavior, negative workgroup emotion has not significant effect on innovative behavior; constructive controversy has a positive effect on innovative behavior; positive workgroup emotion played a moderating role in the relationship between constructive controversy and innovation behavior actively, and nega- tive workgroup emotion played a moderating role in the relationship between constructive controversy and innovation be- havior inversely. The integration of emotion and innovation education can create a positive emotional atmosphere to im- prove the innovation ability effectively.

作者张敏

机构地区温州大学商学院

出处《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第11期144-148,共5页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基金教育部人文社科规划基金项目(12YJAZH193)

关键词建设性争辩团队情绪团队成员创新行为调节作用模型 Constructive Controversy Workgroup Emotion Innovation Behavior of Team Mumber Moderating Effect Model

分类号 G301 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1潘晓云.团队冲突对团队成员情绪影响的研究——国外理论综述及我国的实证研究[J].河南社会科学,2011,19(1):131-135. 被引量：5
2WEST M A, FARRJ. Innovation at work: psychological perspectives[.T]. Social Behavior, 1989(4) :15-30.
3SCOTT S G,BRUCE R A, Determinants of innovative be-havior: a path model of individual innovation in the work-place[J]. Academy of ManagementJournal, 1994, 37 (3): 580-607.
4GEORG[J M, ZHOUJ. Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: the role of context and clarity of feelings[J].Journal of Applied Psychology ,2002, 87 (4):687-697.
5HULLETT C R. The impact of mood on persuasion: a me-ta-analysis[1J. Communication Research, 2005 , 32 (4) : 423- 442.
6ILlES R i. WAGNER D T, MORGESON F P. Explaining affective linkages in teams: individual difference in suscepti-bility to contagion and individualism-collectivism[J].Jour-nal of Applied Psychology, 2007 ,92(4): 1140-1148.
7AMABILE T M,BARSADE S G,MUELLERJ Sv et al. Af-fect and creativity at work[J]. Administrative Science Quar-terly, 2005,50(3) :367-403.
8谢霍坚,陈国权,刘春红.团队组织模型--构建中国企业高效团队[M].上海:上海远东出版社,2003.
9TJOSVOLD D. Implications of controversy research for management[J].Journal of Management, 1985 , 11 (1) : 21- 27.
10BANSAL H S,SHIRLEY F T. Investigating interactive effects in the theory of planned behavior in a service-switching context[J]. Psychology and Marketing, 2002 , 19 (5): 407-425.

二级参考文献5

1Putnam, L. L. and Poole, M. S. (1987). Conflict and negotiation. P549--599 in F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts and L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication : An interdisciplinary perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2Deutsch, M. (1990). Sixty years of conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 237-- 263.
3McCain, B. E., O' Reilly lII, C. A. and Pfeffer, J. ( 1983).The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 626-641.
4Janis, I. L. (1982). Victims of groupthink, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
5Nemeth, C. J. ( 1986).Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychology Review, 93, 23-32.