期刊文献+

小野寺预后营养指数在老年结直肠癌患者预后评估中的应用 被引量:17

Application of Onodera prognostic nutrition index in prognostic evaluation of elderly patients with colorectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨小野寺预后营养指数(简称小野寺指数)在老年结直肠癌患者预后评估中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析2004年11月至2006年12月间广州市第一人民医院收治的163例老年(65岁以上)结直肠癌患者的临床和随访资料。根据患者入院后首次血常规和生化检查结果,计算小野寺指数[小野寺指数=白蛋白值(g/L)+5×淋巴细胞总数(10^9L)]。分析小野寺指数与临床病理特征、手术方式、术后并发症及胃肠道功能恢复的相关性,并通过Cox回归模型筛选影响老年结直肠癌患者的预后因素。结果163例结直肠癌患者小野寺指数为24.3~60.3(44.0±6.9),根据小野寺指数分为营养较好组(小野寺指数大于或等于45,77例)和营养较差组(小野寺指数小于45,86例)。两组根治性切除的患者比例分别为90.9%(70/77)和62.8%(54/86),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。两组根治性切除术后总并发症发生率分别为17.1%(12/70)和53.7%(29/54),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。相关分析显示,小野寺指数与患者年龄、肿瘤部位、肿瘤大小、手术方式、术后总并发症及术后肛门排粪时间具有相关性(均P〈0.05)。营养较好组和营养较差组术后5年生存率分别为64%和24%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);多因素Cox回归分析证实,小野寺指数是影响术后总体生存的独立预后因素(RR=0.888,95%CI:0.800~0.985,P=0.025)。结论小野寺指数能较好地反映老年结直肠癌患者的营养状态、手术风险及预后,是一个较有价值的结直肠癌术前评估及预后分析指标。 Objective To study the applied valuation of Onodera prognostic nutrition index (Onodera index) in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Methods Onodera indexes of 163 elderly patients with colorectal cancer were calculated and these patients were divided into better-nourished group (Onodera index ≥45) and under-nourished group (Onodera index 〈45). Correlations of Onodera index with general data, operation type, postoperative complication, recovery of gastrointestinal function, clinicopathologieal feature and prognosis were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards model was also established to identify the independent prognostic factors for prognosis of elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Results Patients in better-nourished group had significantly higher radical resection rate [90.9% (70/77) vs. 62.8% (54/86), P〈0.011, lower postoperative complication rate [ 17.1% (12/70) vs. 53.7%o(29/54), P〈0.01] and earlier postoperative defecation [(3.09±1.14) d vs. (3.43±1.98) d, P〈0.05] than those in under-nourished group. Onodera index was found to be related to age, tumor location, tumor size, and operation type (all P〈0.05). Better-nourished group had significantly better survival than worse-nourished group (5-year survival rate: 64% vs. 24%, P〈0.01). Onodera index was identified as an independent prognostic factor for elderly patients with colorectal cancer (RR=0.888, 95% CI:0.800-0.985, P=0.025). Conclusion Onodera index is a valuable clinical marker in preoperative estimation as well as prognosis prediction for elderly patients with colorectal cancer.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2013年第6期561-564,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
关键词 小野寺预后营养指数 结直肠肿瘤 老年人 术后并发症 预后 Onodera prognostic nutrition index Colorectal neoplasms Aged Postoperative complication Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, 1984,85 : 1001-1005.
  • 2Sagawa M, Katsube T, Konno S, et al. The significance of Onodera's prognostic nutritional index for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2008,35:2253- 2255.
  • 3Nozoe T, Kimura Y, Ishida M, et al. Correlation of preoperative nutritional condition with postoperative complications in surgical treatment for oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2002,28 : 396-400.
  • 4Nozoe T, Ninomiya M, Maeda T, et al. Prognostic nutritional index: a tool to predict the biological aggressiveness of gastric carcinoma. Surg Today, 2010,40:440-443.
  • 5Kanda M, Fujii T, Kodera Y, et al. Nutritional predictors of postoperative outcome in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg, 2011,98 : 268-274.
  • 6魏琳,张片红.预后营养指数在胃肠道肿瘤手术中的应用[J].河北医学,2000,6(12):1101-1102. 被引量:5
  • 7Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg, 2004,240: 205-213.
  • 8邢军,董新舒.530例老年性结直肠癌外科治疗和预后[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2010,13(1):72-73. 被引量:8
  • 9张克忠,张积书,王艺.老年结直肠癌的治疗[J].中华消化外科杂志,2009,8(5):386-387. 被引量:2
  • 10朱圆,费旭峰,曹伟新.普外科老年患者的营养状况分析[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(3):163-165. 被引量:17

二级参考文献33

  • 1赵东兵,高纪东,毕建军,邵永孚,赵平.T1和T2期直肠癌淋巴结转移特点及预后[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(3):235-237. 被引量:13
  • 2李国华,廖旺娣,刘丕,王健,吕农华,王崇文.大肠癌1561例临床病理分析[J].中华消化杂志,2006,26(8):523-526. 被引量:24
  • 3George J, Chang MD, John M, et al. Are we undertreating rectal cancer in the elder|y? An epidemiologic study. Ann Surg,2007, 246(2) :215 -221.
  • 4Rasheed S, Bowley DM, Aziz O, et al. Can depth of tumour invasion predict lymph node positivity in patients undergoing resection for early rectal cancer? A comparative study between T1 and T2 cancers. Colorectal Dis,2008,10 ( 3 ) :231 - 238.
  • 5Chamlou R, Pare Y, Simon T, et al. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Surg, 2007,246 (6) :916 -922.
  • 6Pernicky M, Murin J, Labas P. Perioperative cardiovascular and noncardiovascular risk in patients with eolorectal cancer. Bratisl Lek Listy,2007,108(6) :246 -250.
  • 7Arenal JJ, de Teresa G, Tinoco C, et al. Abdominal surgery in nonagenarians: short-term results. Surg Today,2007,37(12) :1064 -1067.
  • 8Takada H,Ohsawa T,Iwamoto S,et al.Changing site discription of colorectal cancer in Japan.Dis Colon Rectum,2002,45(9):1249-1254.
  • 9Davila J,El-Serag H,Raoeneck L.A60 is there e true "shift" to the right in the incidence of colorectal cancer?Ann Epidemiol,2002,12:5151.
  • 10Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group.Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients:a systematic revirw.Lancet,2000,356(9234):968-974.

共引文献102

同被引文献145

引证文献17

二级引证文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部