期刊文献+

3.0T MR ADC值和相对ADC值对颈部转移性淋巴结的诊断价值 被引量:7

Apparent diffusion coefficient and relative apparent diffusion coefficient in the dignosis of cervical metastatic lymph nodes with 3.0T MR
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3.0T MR ADC值和相对ADC值(rADC值)对颈部转移性淋巴结的诊断价值。方法对23例颈部淋巴结转移患者(病例组)和40名健康志愿者(对照组)行MR检查,测量对照组脊髓、肌肉、颌下腺和腮腺的ADC值并对比分析,为rADC选取最佳参照部位。测量所有受检者淋巴结ADC值,并计算其rADC值,比较转移性淋巴结与正常淋巴结ADC值与rADC值有无差异。结果①头半棘肌的变异系数最低,腮腺的观察者间一致性最好;②转移性淋巴结(n=28)ADC值和rADC值均低于正常淋巴结(n=57,P均<0.05);③b=600s/mm2时,DWI鉴别诊断转移性淋巴结与正常淋巴结的ADC阈值为0.924×10-3 mm2/s,敏感度90.9%,特异度86.4%;以头半棘肌为参照的rADC阈值为0.489,敏感度86.4%,特异度86.4%;以腮腺为参照的rADC阈值为0.944,敏感度86.4%,特异度81.8%。结论 ADC值及rADC值均有助于区分颈部转移性淋巴结与正常淋巴结;rADC值的诊断价值未较ADC值提高。 Objective To observe the value of ADC and relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC) in the diagnosis of cervical metastatic lymph nodes with 3.0T MR. Methods Totally 23 patients with cervical lymph nodes metastasis (case group) and 40 healthy volunteers (control group) underwent MR examination. ADC of the spinal cord, muscle, submandibular gland and parotid gland in control group were measured, and then the reference site was determined. ADC value of Lymph nodes were measured, and rADC were calculated in all subjects. ADC and rADC of metastatic lymph nodes and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were compared. Results ①Variation coefficient of semispinalis capitis was the lowest, while interobserver consistency of submandibular gland was the best. ②ADC and rADC of metastatic lymph nodes (n=28) were less than those of nonmetastatic lymph nodes (n=57, P〈0.05). ③When b value was 600 s/m^m2 , the threshold value of ADC in the differential diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes and normal lymph nodes was 0. 924 × 10-a mm^2/s, the sensitivity and specificity was 90.9% and 86.4%, the threshold value of rADC referred to semispinalis capitis was 0. 489, the sensitivity and specificity was 86.4G and 86.4%, threshold value of rADC refered to suhmandibular gland was 0. 944, the sensitivity and specificity was 86.4% and 81.8%, respectively. Conclusion ADC and rADC are helpful to discriminating metastatic and nonmetastatic cervical lymph nodes. However, compared to ADC, the diagnostic value of rADC is not improved.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期903-906,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 淋巴结 扩散磁共振成像 表观扩散系数 Lymph node Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Chawla S, Kim S, Loevner LA, et al. Prediction of disease-freesurvival in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head andneck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am JNeuroradiol, 2011, 32(4) : 778-784.
  • 2Klerkx WM, Bax L, Veldhuis WB, et al. Detection of lymphnode metastases by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance ima-ging .. Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst,2010,102(4):244-253.
  • 3Herneth AM, Mayerhoefer M, Schernthaner R, et al. Diffusionweighted imaging : Lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 76(3) : 398-406.
  • 4Maeda M, Kato H, Sakuma H, et al. Usefulness of the apparentdiffusion coefficient in line scan diffusion-weighted imaging fordistinguishing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignantlymphomas of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2005,26(5):1186-1192.
  • 5Perrone A, Guerrisi P, Izzo L, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI incervical lymph nodes : Differentiation between benign and malig-nant lesions. Eur J Radiol, 2011,77(2) :281-286.
  • 6Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Dirix P, et al. Applications of dif-fusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and necksquamous cell carcinoma. Neuroradiology, 2010,52(9) :773-784.
  • 7高光峰,龙淼淼,夏爽,祁吉.颈部良恶性淋巴结的磁共振扩散加权成像研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2011,27(7):996-1000. 被引量:12
  • 8刘侃,周纯武,欧阳汉,罗德红.3.0T MR扩散加权成像鉴别鼻咽癌患者颈部转移淋巴结[J].中国医学影像技术,2010,26(3):468-471. 被引量:16
  • 9Zhang F,Zhu L, Huang X,et al. Differentiation of reactive andtumor metastatic lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted and SPIO-enhanced MRI. Mol Imaging Biol, 2013,15(1) :40-47.
  • 10Kwee TC, Takahara T, Luijten PR, et al. ADC measurementsof lymph nodes : Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility studyand an overview of the literature. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 75(2):215-220.

二级参考文献57

共引文献46

同被引文献65

  • 1宫颈癌及癌前病变规范化诊疗指南(试行)[J].慢性病学杂志,2013(6):401-410. 被引量:99
  • 2刘妍,夏黎明.颈部淋巴结病变的MRI检查及临床意义[J].放射学实践,2006,21(5):533-535. 被引量:2
  • 3杜牧,徐坚民,龚静山,张景忠,朱进,王晓枚.头颈部病变MR扩散成像的初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(9):912-917. 被引量:19
  • 4Koh DM,Collins DJ.Diffttsion-weighted MRI in the body:applications and challenges in oncolosy[J],AJR Am J Roentgeno,2007, 188(6):1622.
  • 5Padhani AR,Liu G,Koh DM,et al,Diffusion-wcighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker:consensus and recommendations[J].Neoplasia,2009,11 (2): 102.
  • 6Galban S,Brisset JC,Rehcmtulla A,et al.Diffusion-weighted MRI for assessment of early cancer treatment response[J].Curr Pharm Biotechnol,2010,11 (6):701.
  • 7Thoeny HC,Ross BD.Predicting and monitoring cancer treatment response with diffusion-weighted MRI[Y].J Magn Reson Imaging,2010,32(1):2.
  • 8AbdelAA,Kandel AY, Soliman N,et al.Role of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differentiation of residual or recurrent head and neck tumors and posttreatment changes[J].AYNR Am J Neuroradiol,2007,28(6): 1146.
  • 9Kim S,Loevner L,Quon H,et al.Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response tochcmoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck[J].Clin Cancer Res,2009,15(3):986.
  • 10Khoo MM,Tyler PA,Saifnddin A,et al.Diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) in musculoskeletal MRI:a critical review[J].Skeletal Radiol,2011,40(6):665.

引证文献7

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部