期刊文献+

缬沙坦与赖诺普利治疗原发性高血压患者在耐受性、安全性和疗效上的比较 被引量:8

Tolerability,Safety and Efficacy of Valsartan Versus Lisinopril in Chinese Patients with Essential Hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :评价缬沙坦 (valsartan)治疗原发性高血压患者的耐受性、安全性和疗效。  方法 :146例轻、中度原发性高血压患者采用随机双盲的研究方法分为缬沙坦组 (n=75 )和赖诺普利 (lisinopril)组 (n=71) ,分别接受缬沙坦 80 mg/d或赖诺普利 10 mg/d,4周后血压控制不满意者 (舒张压≥ 90 mm Hg,1mm Hg=0 .133k Pa) ,接受缬沙坦 16 0 mg/d或赖诺普利 2 0 mg/d。  结果 :缬沙坦与赖诺普利均能有效降低血压。治疗总有效率分别为 6 0 .3%和 6 4.1% ,降压程度及治疗有效率比较统计学无显著性差异 (P>0 .0 5 )。缬沙坦组具有良好的耐受性 ,未见干咳现象 ,而赖诺普利组干咳发生率达 5 .6 %。  结论 :缬沙坦是治疗轻、中度原发性高血压安全有效的药物。 Objective:To evaluate tolerability,safety and efficacy of valsartan in the treatment of essential hypertention. Methods:One hundred and fourty six patients with mild to moderate hypertension were randomly allocated to receive either valsarten 80 mg/d or lisinopril 10 mg/d,which could be increased to 160 mg/d and 20 mg/d if blood pressure control was not satisfied. Results:Both valsartan and lisinopril were effective at lowering blood pressure.Sixty point three per cent and 64 1% of patiente in each group were considered to be effective at 8 weeks with no statistically significant differences between the two groups.Both drugs were well tolerated.Five point six per cent of the patients in lisinopril group had dry cough but not in valsartan group. Conclusion:Valsartan is effective and well tolerated with less side effect in patients with essential hypertension.
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2000年第4期223-224,共2页 Chinese Circulation Journal
关键词 原发性高血压 药物疗法 缬沙坦 赖诺普利 疗效 Valsartan Lisinopril Hypertension
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Markham A,Goa KL.Valsartan a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension[].Drugs.1997
  • 2Black HR,Graff A,Shute D,et al.Valsartan, a new angiotensin Ⅱ antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: efficacy,tolerability and safety compared to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril[].Journal of Human Hypertension.1997
  • 3Benz J,Oshrain C,Henry D,et al.Valsartan, a new angiotensin Ⅱ receptor antagonist : a double-blind study comparing the incidence of cough with lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide[].Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.1997
  • 4Corea L,Cardoni O,Fogari R,et al.Valsartan, a new angiotensin Ⅱ antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: a comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine[].Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.1996
  • 5Holwerda NJ,Fogari R,Angeli P,et al.Valsartan, a new angiotensinⅡ antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: efficacy and safety compared with placebo and enalapril[].Journal of Hypertension.1996
  • 6Thurmann PA.Angiotensin Ⅱ antagonists and the heart : valsartan in left ventricular hypertrophy[].Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology.1999
  • 7Burnier M,Brunner HR.Comparative antihypertensive effects of angiotensin Ⅱ receptor antagonists[].Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.1999

同被引文献52

引证文献8

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部