期刊文献+

有利于行人保护的非对称式发动机罩盖的设计 被引量:10

Design of asymmetric vehicle hood inner for pedestrian head protection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 轿车—行人碰撞中,发动机罩盖是造成行人头部伤害的主要来源。该文进行了6组轿车—儿童行人头型冲击器冲击试验,建立了相应的冲击试验有限元模型(FEM),并完成了模型标定。通过FEM仿真,分析了5种不同内板肋板结构的发动机内罩板吸能特性;并根据某款发动机舱布置,设计了一种非对称式发动机罩盖内罩板;进行了有限元模型验证。结果显示:优化设计后,罩盖的多个冲击点的头部伤害标准HIC值降至1300以下,部分冲击点降至1000以下。因而,明显提升了该种发动机罩盖对行人头部保护。 Engine hoods are a main resource of pedestrian head injuries in vehicle-pedestrian impact. Six tests were made using child pedestrian head impactors, with the corresponding finite element model built and calibrated to improve pedestrian head protection. The energy absorption performances of five types of hood inner structures were analyzed using a finite element model (FEM), with an asymmetric vehicle hood inner then designed according to the engine compartment layout of a kind of vehicle. The results show that the head injury criterion (HIC) at several areas of the hood inner is reduced to less than 1300, a few of which to less than 1000. Therefore, the pedestrian head protection is significantly improved using the asymmetric vehicle hood inner.
出处 《汽车安全与节能学报》 CAS CSCD 2013年第2期142-151,共10页 Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy
基金 浙江省汽车安全技术研究重点实验室建设项目(2009E10013)
关键词 汽车安全 轿车-行人碰撞 行人头部保护 发动机罩盖内板 非对称式设计 crash safety vehicle-pedestrian impact pedestrian head protection vehicle hood innerasymmetric design
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Toroyan T. Global status report on road safety [J]. Injury Prevention, 2009, 15(4): 286-286.
  • 2CHEN Huipeng, FU Lianxue, ZHENG Heyue. A comparative study between China and IHRA for the vehicle-pedestrian impact [J]. SAE Int'l J Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 2009, 2(1): 1108-11IS.
  • 3CHEN Yong, YANG Jikuang, XU Wei, et al. A study on head injury risk in car-to-pedestrian collisions using FE?model [R]. SAE 2009 Digital Human Modelingfor Design and Engineering, SAE Int'l Paper number 2009: 01-2263.
  • 4Arbogast K B, Maltese M R, Caitlin L, et al. Head form impact tests to assess energy management of seat back contact points associated with head injury for pediatric occupants [J]. SAE Int'l J Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 2012, 5(1): 4S4-467.
  • 5QIAO Weigao, WANG Xicheng. Study about the simulation of vehicle-pedestrian collision and protection [R]. SAE Technical Paper, 2007: 01-3S94.
  • 6Facts T S. A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system [J/OL]. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT HS, 2003, 809: 77S. (2013-01-01). http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/809-360.pdf.
  • 7European New Car Assessment Programme Pedestrian Protocol [S/OL]. Version 7.0, 2013. (2013-03-20) http:// wenku. baidu.com/view/b348c41210a6fS24ccbf85a8. html.
  • 8Jose B, Andres A, Miguel M, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of pedestrian protection systems through in?depth accident investigation, reconstruction and simulation [R]. SAE Technical Paper, 2009: 36-0398.
  • 9Worgotter F, Kassegger H, Winkler S, et al. Influence of system boundaries and boundary conditions on pedestrian protection head impact [R]. SAE Technical Paper, 2009: 01-1208.
  • 10Berg A, EgelhaafM, Ebner H T. Estimation of benefits resulting from impactor-testing for pedestrian protection [C]//Proc Int'l Technical Confon the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2003: 13.

同被引文献101

引证文献10

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部