期刊文献+

胶州湾12种饵料鱼类耳石大小与体长的关系 被引量:11

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OTOLITH SIZE AND FISH SIZE FOR TWELVE PREY FISH SPECIES FROM JIAOZHOU BAY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据2008年11月至2009年8月在胶州湾海域进行的逐月定点底拖网调查,选择12种常见的饵料鱼类作为研究对象,运用最小二乘法分析了每种饵料鱼类的体长与耳石形态大小(包括耳石的长度、宽度、长半径和短半径)的关系,并建立回归方程,旨在为深入研究高营养级鱼类的摄食生态和食物网营养动力学提供基础资料。研究表明,12种饵料鱼类的体长与体重均呈显著的幂函数关系(P<0.05),回归系数b值在2.871—3.371,平均值为3.159±0.110(95%CL),b值最小的鱼种是六丝钝尾虾虎鱼Amblychaeturichthys hex-anema,最大的是细条天竺鲷Apogon lineatus。经检验,Liza haematocheilus和箭鱼衔Callionymus sagitta的b值与3无显著差异(P<0.05),属等速生长;李氏鱼衔Callionymus richardsonii和六丝钝尾虾虎鱼的b值显著小于3(P<0.05),属负异速生长;其余8种鱼类的b值均大于3(P<0.05),为正异速生长。方差分析表明,12种鱼类的体长与耳石各个形态参数的回归关系均极显著(P<0.01)。在所有48个回归方程中,有37个方程的决定系数R2值大于0.8,拟合效果较好;有9个回归方程的R2值在0.7—0.8;其余2个回归方程的R2值小于0.7,拟合效果略差。其中,各方程拟合效果最好的是六丝钝尾虾虎鱼,其R2值均接近于1。通过比较同种鱼类各个回归方程的R2值可知,在这12种饵料鱼类中,多数鱼种体长与耳石长度和宽度的拟合效果要略好于体长与耳石半径的拟合效果,因此在实际应用中,可以通过测量耳石的长度和宽度来推算饵料鱼类的体长等形态参数。另一方面,由于多数鱼类的耳石比较脆,尤其是耳石的两端更容易破损,因此与耳石长度相比,耳石宽度与体长的回归方程更加适合于实际应用。 Based on the bottom trawl surveys in Jiaozhou Bay from November 2008 to August 2009, the relationships between otolith size (including otolith length, width, long radius and short radius) and fish length of 12 prey fish species were studied in order to provide basic information for further research of feeding ecology of higher trophic level fishes and marine trophodynamics. A total of 1063 samples were collected for all the 12 fish species, belonging to 3 orders, 7 families and 11genera. Results showed that there were significant power functional relationships between length and weight for 12 prey fish species (P〈0.05). The coefficient of regression (b) in the length-weight relationship functions ranged from 2.871 to 3.371, with the mean value of b being 3.159±0.110 (95% CL). In all the 12 prey fish species, Amblychaeturichthys hexanema had the lowest value of b and Apogon lineatus had the highest value. T-test showed that Liza haematocheila and Callionymus sagitta presented isometric growth (P〈0.05), Callionymus richardsonii and A. hexanema presented negative allometric growth (P〈0.05), and the other 8 species presented positive allometric growth (P〈0.05). The analysis of variance indicated that the regressions between otolith size and fish standard length were extremely significant (P〈0.01). In all 48 regression functions, the determination coefficients (R2) were larger than 0.8 in 37 functions, between 0.7 and 0.8 in 9 functions and lower than 0.7 in the rest two functions. Among all the 12 fish species, A. hexanema had the highest value of R2 (close to 1), while Engraulis japonicus had the lowest value of R2 (lower than 0.8). According to the value of R2 in different functions of the same species, the regression functions of otolith length and width to fish standard length fitted better than the functions of otolith radius to fish standard length for most fish species. Therefore, the size of prey fishes could be estimated by means of otolith length and width. On the other hand, because the tip of the otolith may be damaged frequently in the stomachs of fish, which made it uneasy to measure accurate otolith length, so the regression function of otolith width to fish standard length is more suitable in practice.
出处 《水生生物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期481-487,共7页 Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(41006083) 山东省自然科学基金(ZR2010DQ026) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(201022001) 国家海洋公益性行业科研专项(200805066)资助
关键词 胶州湾 饵料鱼类 矢耳石 体长 耳石大小 Jiaozhou Bay Prey fishes Sagittal otolith Fish length Otolith sizes
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1窦硕增.鱼类的耳石信息分析及生活史重建一理论、方法与应用.海洋科学集刊,2007,48:93.113.
  • 2Petursdottir G, Begg G A, Marteinsdottir G. Discrimination between Icelandic cod (Gadus morhua L.) populations from adjacent spawning areas based on otolith growth and shape [J]. Fisheries Research, 2006, 80(2-3): 182--189.
  • 3向建国,向劲,王星璐,李钟杰,谢松光.湘江鳡仔稚鱼个体和耳石生长发育研究[J].水生生物学报,2011,35(5):817-822. 被引量:10
  • 4张国华,但胜国,苗志国,邓书东.六种鲤科鱼类耳石形态以及在种类和群体识别中的应用[J].水生生物学报,1999,23(6):683-688. 被引量:36
  • 5Potier M, M6nard F, Benivary H D, et al. Length and weight estimates from diagnostic hard part structures of fish, erus- tacea and cephalopods forage species in the western Indian Ocean [J]. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2011, 92(3): 413--423.
  • 6Fitch J E, Brownell R L. Fish otoliths in cetacean stomach and their importance in interpreting feeding habits [J]. Jour- nal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1968, 25(12) 2561--2574.
  • 7Pierce G J, Boyle P R. A review of methods for diet analysis in piscivorous marine mammals [J]. Oceanography and Ma- rine Biology Annual Review, 1991, 29:409---486.
  • 8Tollit D J, Steward M J, Thompson P M, et al. Species and size difference in the digestion of otoliths and beaks: placa- tions for estimates of pinniped diet composition [J]. Cana- dian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1997, 54(1): 105--119.
  • 9Watanabe H, Kubodem T, Ichii T, et al. Feeding habits of neon flying squid Ommastraphes bartramii in the transi- tional region of the central North Pacific [J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2004, 266:173--184.
  • 10Gamboa D A. Otolith size versus weight and body-length relationships for eleven fish species of Baja California, Mexico [J]. Fishery Bulletin, 1991, 89(4): 701--706.

二级参考文献101

共引文献311

同被引文献181

引证文献11

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部