期刊文献+

博士研究生科研不端行为影响因素研究 被引量:10

Study on the Factors Inducing Scientific Research Misconducts of Doctoral Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现如今,科研不端行为在博士研究生群体中呈蔓延趋势.本研究通过494份博士研究生样本探讨了科研不端行为的影响因素.研究结果显示,科研压力对科研不端行为的科学导向和关系导向均有显著正向影响;科研资源供给对科研不端行为的关系导向具有显著负向影响,但是对科学导向没有显著影响;教育惩罚政策对科研不端行为的科学导向具有显著负向影响,但是对关系导向没有显著影响.研究还发现,科研不端行为的科学导向和关系导向在性别、学科类别、博士类型等人口统计学变量上具有显著差异性. Nowadays, misconducts in scientific research are overflowing in the doctoral student group. Here it discusses the factors inducing misconducts in scientific research with 494 doctoral student samples. The results indicate that scientific research stress has significant positive effects on scientific research misconducts in the respects of factual and relationship orientation. Scientific reseach resources supply has significant negative effects on scientific research misconducts of relationship orientation, but doesn' t have effects on scientific research misconducts of factual orientation. Education penalty policy has significant negative effects on scientific research misconducts of factual orientation, but doesn' t have effects on scientific research misconducts of relationship orientation. Furthermore, scientific research misconducts of both factual and relationship orientation have significant differences among demography variables, such as gender, subject, doctor type, and so on.
作者 赵书松 赵君
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期96-105,共10页 R&D Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"绩效考核与管理伦理的交互作用及其影响机制研究"(70972016) 全国教育科学"十二五"规划2012年度教育部青年专项基金项目"科研不端行为的形成与扩散机制及其治理策略研究"(EEA120356)
关键词 科研不端行为 科研压力 科研资源供给 教育惩罚政策 scientific research misconduct scientific research stress scientific research resources supply education penalty policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Marquand R. Research fraud rampant in China [ N]. Christian Science Monitor,2006-05-16.
  • 2刘虹.三成研究生认同实验数据“可修改”[N].羊城晚报,2007-06-13.
  • 3赵延东.博士毕业生对学术不端行为的态度及成因分析[J].中国软科学,2008(5):45-51. 被引量:37
  • 4赵君,廖建桥,张永军.科研不端行为的维度与测量[J].科学学研究,2012,30(8):1143-1148. 被引量:16
  • 5Martinson B C, Anderson M S, Crain A L, et al. Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-repor- ted misbehaviors [J]. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,2006,1 (1) :51 -66.
  • 6Davis M S, Riske M, Seaman M. Research misconduct: An inquiry into etiology and stigma [ R ]. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity,2002.
  • 7Redman B K, Merz J F. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct [ J ]. Accountability in Research : Pol- icies and Quality Assurance ,2005,12 ( 3 ) : 157 - 162.
  • 8Gaddisa B, Hehon-Fautha W, Scotta G, et al. Development of two measures of climate for scientific organiza- tions [ J ]. Accountability in Research,2003,10 (4) : 253 - 288.
  • 9Rees L H. Fraud and misconduct in medical research: Prevention [ M ]// Lock S, Wells F, Farthing M. Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research. 3rd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group,2001:225 -243.
  • 10阎光才,张银霞.高校学术失范问题的探索性实证研究[J].北京大学教育评论,2010,8(2):121-134. 被引量:29

二级参考文献100

共引文献175

同被引文献125

引证文献10

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部