期刊文献+

大学生情绪及情绪智力对风险决策的影响 被引量:6

The Influence of Emotion and Emotional Intelligence on Risk Decision of College Students.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨情绪、情绪智力对风险决策的影响。方法采用情绪智力测评量表(MSCEIT)测量200名大学生的情绪智力,将高于平均分一个标准差得分的被试组成情绪智力高分组,低于平均分一个标准差得分的被试组成情绪智力低分组,每组30人。而后用短影片引发不同情绪,最后测量他们在不同情绪下决策的风险倾向。结果①短影片有效诱发快乐情绪,引发后与愤怒组及对照组有显著差异(F=27.51,P<0.001);②短影片有效诱发愤怒情绪,引发后与快乐组及对照组有显著差异(F=53.00,P<0.001);③情绪对风险决策影响不显著(F=1.20,P>0.05);④情绪智力对风险决策的影响不显著(F=1.83,P>0.05)。结论短影片能有效诱发大学生的快乐和愤怒情绪,但对大学生的情绪智力及情绪对风险决策没有显著影响。 Objective To investigate 7-year medical students' time management disposition,and analyze its relationship with self-efficacy and anxiety.Methods A total of 803 7-year medical students were tested by means of Adolescence Time Management Disposition Scale(ATMD),General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES)and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS).Results The average score of 7-year medical students' time management disposition was(154.34±20.02).There was sex difference on time management disposition(r=-2.199,P0.05),but there was no grade and source of the students difference(F=1.031,0.742;P0.05);The 7-year medical students' time management disposition was positively correlated with self-efficacy(r=0.537,P0.01)and negatively correlated with anxiety(r=-0.225,P0.01).Self-efficacy and anxiety had significantly predictive effect on time management disposition(R=0.565,R2=0.319,P0.001).Conclusion The level of 7-year medical students' time management disposition is relatively high and significantly related with self-efficacy and anxiety.Self-efficacy and anxiety have significantly predictive effect on time management disposition.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2013年第6期926-928,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 决策心理学 风险决策 情绪 情绪智力 Decision psychology Risk decision Emotion Emotional intelligence
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献49

  • 1于泳红,汪航.选项数量和属性重要性对决策中信息加工的影响[J].应用心理学,2005,11(3):222-226. 被引量:11
  • 2于泳红.多属性决策任务中焦虑型个体的信息加工特点研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(5):1157-1158. 被引量:3
  • 3曹蓉,王晓钧.多重情绪智力量表(MEIS)的信度、结构效度及应用评价研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):419-421. 被引量:10
  • 4Hackett G, Betz N E. A self-efficacy approach to the career development of woman. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1981, 18:326-339.
  • 5Jepsen D A, Dilley J S. Vocational decision-making models: A review and comparative analysis. Review of Educational. Research, 1974, 44 (3) : 331-349.
  • 6Peterson G W, Sampson J P. Using readiness assessment to imprave career services: A cognitive information processing approach. The Career Development Quarterly, 2002, 49:146-174.
  • 7Gati I, Asher I. The PIC model for career decision making: Prescreening, In-depth exploration and choice//Osipow M, Samuel H, Frederick T L, Barak A. Contemporary Models in Vocational Psychology: A Volume, Honor of Samuel H. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001, 7-54.
  • 8Holland J L. Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (3rd) . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.
  • 9Lent R W, Brown S D, Hackett G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1994, 45:79-122.
  • 10Dawis R V, Lofquist L H. A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. 123-142.

共引文献155

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部