期刊文献+

通过主题阅读提升学生的阅读素养:理念、策略与实验探索 被引量:39

To Promote Students' Reading Literacy by Implementing Thematic Reading Activity: Conception,Strategy and Experimental Exploration
原文传递
导出
摘要 课堂中的精读教学主要教给学生阅读理解的基本技能和方法,而更全面地提升学生的阅读素养则还需通过开展广泛阅读来实现。根据阅读素养的要求和当前广泛阅读现状,主题阅读是值得我们研究、使用的重要方法。主题阅读活动以主题为核心组织阅读材料,开展互动交流,体现合作学习、社群互动、促进学习的评估等理念。通过实验研究证明,主题阅读活动对学生在阅读数量和广度、阅读兴趣、社群互动、理解能力等方面的表现都有积极的作用,是提升学生阅读素养的有效方法。 Intensive reading in class mainly cultivates students ability to comprehend, while extensive reading ensures a comprehensive development of students reading literacy. Thematic Reading Activity (TRA) in extensive reading will contribute to the knowledge and enhancement of students reading literacy. TRA encourages students to read extensively on a given theme or topic in a reading group, and then communicate with group members actively. It incorporates concepts of collaborative learning, community interaction and assessment for learning. Empirical data obtained from implementation of TRA demonstrate positive impacts in a number of fronts, including the quantity and variety of reading, students reading interest, community interaction, and comprehension ability, which prove TRA to be an effective method of cultivating students reading literacy.
作者 祝新华 廖先
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期101-106,157,共7页 Educational Research
基金 香港特别行政区教育局资助项目"提升小学生中文阅读能力研究:有效的学习 教学与评估策略研究报告"(项目编号:CD/CP/71-0827)的研究成果之一
关键词 阅读素养 主题阅读活动 阅读兴趣 社群互动 reading literacy, thematic reading activity, reading interests, community interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Mullis, I.V.S., et al. PIRLS 2011 Assessment Framework [ M ]. Boston: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College, 2009.
  • 2OECD. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework Key Competencies in Reading,Mathematics and Science[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2010.
  • 3祝新华,廖先.持久而有效地推行广泛阅读:国外的经验与我们的改进策略[J].教育研究与实验,2012(4):31-36. 被引量:8
  • 4新加坡教育部课程规划与发展司.策略、实践、反思[M].新加坡:教育出版社,2009.
  • 5祝新华,等.小学阅读评价标准研究(研究中期报告)[R].北京:全国教育科学规划"十一五"国家课题"中小学生学科学业评价标准的研究与开发"的子课题,2009.
  • 6祝新华,等.提升小学生中文阅读能力研究:有效的学习、教学与评估策略研究报告[R].香港:香港教育局,香港理工大学,2010.
  • 7Clarke, John H. & Agne, Russell M. Interdisciplinary High School Teaching: Strategies for Integrated Learning [M]. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997.
  • 8Norton, D. E. Webbing and Historical Fiction [J]. Reading Teacher, 1993, (5).
  • 9Barton, K. C. & Smith, L. A. Themes or Motifs? Aiming for Coherence through Interdisciplinary Outlines [J]. The Reading Teacher, 2000, (1).
  • 10祝新华,廖先.国际视域下构建“促进学习的评估”新体系[J].教育发展研究,2012,32(15):14-20. 被引量:10

二级参考文献97

  • 1DerekRowntree.英汉教育辞典[M].陈任广,杨义明,译.台北:五洲出版社,1989.
  • 2Black P, William D. Assessment and Classroom Learning [J]. Assessment in Education.. Principles, Policy ~ Practice, 1998, 5 (1): 7-75.
  • 3Assessment Reform Group. Assessment for Learning: Beyond the Black Box [M]. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1999.
  • 4Assessment Reform Group. Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles, Research-Based Principles to Guide Classroom Practice [ DB/OL]. http: // Www. qeda. gov. uk/libraryAssets/rnedia/4031_afl_ principles, pdf. 2009-11-09.
  • 5McCallum B. Forrmtive Assessment: Implications for Classroom Practice [EB/OL]. The Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency Ckdine Library Assets Web site. http. //www. qcda. gov. uk/libraryAssets/ media/formative (1). pdf. 2009-11-16.
  • 6Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Formative Assessmem: Improving I,earning in Secondary Classrooms. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation [DB/OL]. http.. //www. oecd. org/ dataoecd/19/31/35661078, pdf. 2008-07-03,.
  • 7Hattie. J. , Timperley, H.. The Power of Feedback [J]. Review of Educational Research, 2007, 77 (1): 81--112.
  • 8Cohen V B. A Re-examination of Feedback in Computer-based Instruction: Implications for Instructional design [J]. Educational Technology, 1985, 25 (1): 33-37.
  • 9Pridemore I) R. , Klein J D. Control of Practice and Level of Feedback in Computer-based Instruction [J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1995 (20): 444-450.
  • 10Moreno R. Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory Versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-based Multimedia [J]. Instructional Science, 2004 (32): 99-113.

共引文献25

同被引文献185

引证文献39

二级引证文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部