期刊文献+

基于SSP范式的环境影响评价有效性研究 被引量:1

Study on Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment Based on “State-Structure-Performance” (SSP)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 引入美国密歇根州立大学教授阿兰斯密德开创的状态-结构-绩效(SSP)范式来分析我国环境影响评价制度的执行绩效。通过对该制度成本和收益的比较得出:环境影响评价制度的设计所带来的绩效更倾向于占社会总体一少部分的政府与建设单位,占社会总体绝大多数的公众的环境权益得到的是形式的而非实质的保证,最终导致制度设计与制度目标的背离。 This paper introduces "state-structure-performance" (SSP) to study the effectiveness of environmental impact assessment proposed by professor Allan A. Schmid. The analysis shows that the performance of EIA system leansto the government and the owner which are minorities in society, but the environmental rights and interests of public which is majority in society are insured formally not virtually and eventually lead to a departure from the system design and system goals.
出处 《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期163-166,共4页 Ecological Economy
关键词 环境影响评价 有效性 SSP范式 environmental impact assessment effectiveness SSP (state-structure-performance)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1JayS, Jones C, Slinn P, et al. Environmental Impact Assessment:Retrospect and Prospect [J], Environmental Impact AssessmentReview, 2007, 27(4): 287-300.
  • 2CashimoreGwilliam R, Morgan R, et al. The Interminable Issueof Effectiveness: Substantive Purposes, Outcomes and ResearchChallenges in the Advancement of Environmental Impact AssessmentTheory [J]. Impact Assess Proj Apprais,2004, 22: 295-310.
  • 3CashmoreM, Richardson T, Hilding-Ryedvik T, et al. Evaluatingthe Effectiveness of Impact Assessment Instruments: Theorisingthe Nature and Implications of Their Political Constitution [J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2010, 30(6): 371-379.
  • 4阿兰-斯密德.财产、权利与公共选择[M]..上海:三联出版社,1999:1-32.
  • 5阿兰-斯密德.制度与行为经济学.北京[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002: 1 -27.
  • 6王冰,李文震.制度经济学中的制度影响理论[J].江汉论坛,2001(2):15-19. 被引量:5
  • 7李玉文,孙洪刚.我国环境影响评价公众参与的现状和对策[J].环境科学动态,2004(1):3-5. 被引量:19
  • 8冉庆凯,栾胜基.环境影响评价有效性的制度特征分析[J].环境保护,2005,33(7B):17-19. 被引量:10

二级参考文献10

共引文献31

同被引文献21

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部