摘要
当历史领域的"宏大叙事"模式渐渐被片断的、断裂的现象所取代之时,《夏鼐日记》的出版不仅为我们全方位了解这位学术大师的心路历程提供绝佳的机会,而且还能成为研究中国现代学术史乃至现当代历史的有益"增补"。与夏鼐先生同时代并有着相似经历的钱鐘书先生也留下了名著《围城》。本文尝试着对《夏鼐日记》前三卷和小说《围城》这两部不同的"作品"进行"互读",以期进一步理解上世纪三四十年代以及那一代学人的风范。任何"作品"都无可避免地带有一定的"视角",但倘若各种不同的"视角"彼此交织、互为补充,那么,关于"过去"图景的立体"拼图"就会趋于完整。
When the mode of “grand narrative” in field of history has been replacing by breaking and fragmentary phenomena, “The Diary of Xia Nia” can not only offer us a good opportunity to understand the mind and thought of the great master, but doubtlessly serve as a significant “supplement” to Studies of modem history of scholarship as well as history itself. Meanwhile. Qian Zhongshu, who shares the similar background and experience, once published a famous novel “Fortress Besieged”. This paper has tried to make a mutually complementary reading of the above two works, expecting to understand 1930＇s and 1940＇s and the masters. Any written work of literature unavoidably bears a certain “perspective”. But if these “perspectives” could be interwoven with and complementary to each other, then the puzzle of “tile past” would become muhidimensional, thus more accurate.
出处
《南方文物》
2013年第2期108-112,共5页
Cultural Relics in Southern China
关键词
《夏鼐日记》
《围城》
互读
现代学术史
The Diary ofXia Nia, Fortress Besieged, mutually complementary reading, modern history of scholarship
