期刊文献+

基于容积CT中耳前庭窗及前庭窗龛的解剖学研究

The anatomic study of the oval window and oval window niche by the volume CT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨正常前庭窗及前庭窗龛形态学特点,为进一步研究该区相关疾病的影像学诊断提供正常值参数,为相关手术提供解剖学数据。方法收集2011年4月~2012年7月在北京同仁医院行颞骨64层螺旋CT检查,且符合纳入标准的受检者240例(480耳),并将其按年龄分为四组:儿童组(﹤18岁),青年组(18岁≦年龄﹤45岁),中年组(45岁≦年龄﹤60岁),老年组(≧60岁)。每组60例,男女各30例。采用后处理工作站Extended BrillianceTM Work-space(EBW)多平面重建,图像经标准化处理后测量前庭窗及前庭窗龛各径线、方位以及对前庭窗和面神经水平段的关系进行分类。左、右侧别间比较采用配对样本t检验,男、女性别间比较采用独立样本t检验,不同组别间比较采用单因素方差分析,设定P值﹤0.05有统计学意义。结果①前庭窗及前庭窗龛各测量值在左右侧别、男女性别及不同年龄组间比较,P值均﹥0.05,差异无统计学意义;②240例前庭窗及前庭窗龛各测量值及95%置信区间分别为(单位mm):横轴位前庭窗径长1.46±0.40(0.68~2.24);冠状位前庭窗径长1.19±0.19(0.82~1.56),前庭窗龛外口径长3.14±0.47(2.22~4.06),前庭窗龛深2.24±0.32(1.61~2.87);矢状位前庭窗径长1.73±0.33(1.08~2.38),前庭窗龛外口径长2.59±0.44(1.73~3.45),前庭窗龛深3.14±0.52(2.12~4.16)。前庭窗空间位置及95%置信区间分别为:前庭窗前后方位内倾角21.30°±7.99°(5.64°~36.96°);前庭窗上下方位外倾角42.15°±8.60°(25.29°~59.01°);前庭窗左右方位前倾角74.19°±11.10°(52.43°~95.95°)。结论容积CT可很好显示前庭窗及前庭窗龛细微结构影像解剖,结合后处理技术可准确进行量化测量,为该区异常病变的诊断及避免术中意外损伤提供可靠信息。 Objective To investigate the morphological features of the oval window and the oval window niche in subject and to provide the significant data for the future imaging diagnosis and the operations in this area. Methods The patients who underwent temporal CT scan were collected from Apr. 2011 to Jul. 2012. The 240 cases (480 sides)who met the inclusion criteria were divided into 4 groups:the child group ( 〈 18 years), the teenager group (18 years≤ the age 〈 45 years ), the middle age group (45 years ≤ the age 〈 60 years), the older group (≥ 60 years). Through the multiplanar reconstruction of the images in post-processing workstation, the measurements in the ovalwindow and the ovalwindow niche were performed. Results ① There was no statistically significant difference in the related measurements of the oval window in sides, genders and among the different groups ( P 〉 0.05). The measurements in the oval window and the oval window niche and 95 % confidence interval were as follow: at axial plane, the length of of the oval window was 1.46 ± 0. 40(0.68±2.24) mm, at coronal plane, the length of of the oval window was 1.19±0.19(0.82-1.56) mm, the length of the niche in exterior open was 3.14±0.47(2.22-4.06) mm, the depth of the oval window niche was 2.24±0.32(1.61- 2.87) mm, at sagittal plane, the length of of the oval window was 1.73±0.33(1.08-2.38) mm, the length of the niche in exterior open was 2.59±0.44(1.73-3.45) mm, the depth of the oval window niche was 3.14±0.52(2.12±4.16) ram. The spacial position of the oval window and 95% confidence interval were as follow: the inward angle of the oval window in anterior-posterior position was 21.30°-7.99°(5.64°-36.96°) , the extraversion angle of the round window in the superior-inferior position was 42.15°-8.60°(25.29±59.01) , the anteversion angle of the round window in the left-right position was 74.19°-11.10°(52.43°-95.95°). Conclusion The volume CT can clearly display the location and the morphology of the ovalwindow and the ovalwindow niche, with the post-processing technology, can provide more useful information for the imaging diagnosis and the operations.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2013年第6期850-854,共5页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 前庭窗 前庭窗龛 解剖 体层摄影术 X线计算机 Oval window Oval window niche Anatomy Tomography, X-ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Zeifer B, Sabini P, Sonne J. Congenital absence of the oval window: radiologic diagnosis and associated anomalies [J]. AmJ Neuroradiol, 2000, 21: 322.
  • 2Djeri D, Savi D. Anatomical characteristics of the fossula fenestraevestibuli [J]. LaryngolOtol, 1987, 101: 426-431.
  • 3李文明,李明,王爱莲.前庭窗区域的应用解剖[J].昆明医学院院报,1986,7:25-27.
  • 4Mafee MF, Henrikson GC, Deitch RL, et al. Use of CT in stapedial otosclerosis [J]. Radiology, 1985, 156-709.
  • 5Jahrsdoerfer RA. Congenital absence of the oval window [J]. ORLJ Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 1977, 84:904- 914.
  • 6Harada T, Black FO, Sand O1, et al. Temporal bone his- topathologic findings in congenital anomalies of the oval win dow [J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1980, 88:275-287.
  • 7姜洒长.耳解剖学与颞骨组织病理学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1999.10.
  • 8Teunissen EB, Cremers WR. Classification of congenital mid- dle ear anomalies. Report on 144 ears [J]. Ann Otol Rhinol I.aryngol, 1993, 102: 606.
  • 9易自翔,杨劲松,李志春,叶胜难,林功标,周爱东.先天性双耳镫骨及卵圆窗缺如的诊断和治疗[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1999,34(5):293-295. 被引量:2
  • 10赵守琴.振动声桥植入[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2011,19(5):394-396. 被引量:5

二级参考文献28

  • 1[1]Vannier MW, Marsh JL. Three-dimensional imaging, surgical planning and image-guided therapy. Radiol Clin North Am, 1996,34(3): 545
  • 2[2]Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis:comparrison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology, 1994,190(1) :180
  • 3[3]Wiet GJ, Stredney DL, Yagel R et al. Using advanced simulation technology for cranial base tumor evaluation. Otolaryngol Clin North AM,1998,31(2) :341
  • 4[4]Taguchic K, Aradate H. Algorithm For image reconstruction in multislice helical CT. Med Phys, 1998,25(4):5650
  • 5Fisch U, Cremers CWRJ, Lenarz T, et al. Clinical experience with the vibrant soundbridge implant device[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2001,22:962.
  • 6Frenzel H ,Hanke F, Beltrarne M,et al. Application of the vibrant soundbridge in bilateral congenital atresia in toddlers[J]. Acta OtoLaryngologica, 2010, 130 : 966.
  • 7Streitberger C, Perotti M, Behrame MA,et al. Vibrant soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery[J]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol, 2009,130: 83.
  • 8Bruschini L, Forli F, Giannarelli M, et al. Exclusive transcanal surgical approach for vibrant soundbridge implantation: surgical and functional results[J].Otol Neurotol, 2009,30; 950.
  • 9Colletti V, Soli SD, Carner M, et al. Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window[J]. Int J Audiol, 2006, 45: 600.
  • 10Arnold A, Kompis M, Candreia C, et al. The floating mass transducer at the round window: Direct transmission or bone conduction[J].? Hear Res.2010, 263: 120.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部