期刊文献+

利用钆塞酸二钠增强MR评估肝脏储备功能 被引量:23

Evaluation of liver function reserve with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立基于钆塞酸二钠增强MR的肝脏储备功能评估方法,探讨其与肝硬化患者肝功能Child—Pugh分级的关系。方法回顾性分析40例接受钆塞酸二钠增强MR检查的肝硬化患者临床及影像资料,根据Child—Pugh分级将患者分为A、B和c级。通过钆塞酸二钠增强MR检测肝脏体积、全肝及肝脏各段肝细胞期相对强化程度等指标,构建全肝钆塞酸二钠相对摄取值作为肝脏整体储备功能的评价指标,并以肝脏各段肝细胞期相对强化程度作为肝脏各段储备功能的评价指标。采用单因素方差分析比较不同Child—Pugh分级全肝钆塞酸二钠相对摄取值及肝脏各段肝细胞期相对强化程度的差异。结果Child—PughA、B和c级患者分别为23、10和7例。A、B和c级全肝钆塞酸二钠相对摄取值分别为1212±168、695±161和234±55,差异有统计学意义(F=122.05,P〈0.01)。A级患者肝脏s1~s8各段的相对强化程度分别为1.13±0.22、1.12±0.50、0.81±0.24、1.08±0.32、1.41±0.25、1.10±0.30、1.16±0.41和1.17±0.23,差异有统计学意义(F=5.93,P〈0.01),B和C级患者各段的相对强化程度差异无统计学意义(F=1.95,1.83;P〉0.05)。结论钆塞酸二钠增强MR可用于定量评估肝硬化患者的肝脏整体储备功能,且其对肝脏功能分段评估具有很大潜力。 Objective To determine the values of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI for quantitatively evaluating the liver function reserve. Methods Forty consecutive liver cirrhosis patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. All the patients underwent complete routine laboratory tests and the gadoxetate disodium-enhaneed MR imaging with the same parameters. Liver volume and the relative enhancement index of the whole liver in hepatocellular phase were used to calculate liver relative uptake value,which is supposed to represent the total liver function reserve. And the function reserve of all liver segments was evaluated respectively by the relative enhancement index of each liver segment. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analyses. Results The patient number in Child-Pugh A, B and C group was 23,10 and 7 ,respectively. Significant differences was observed in liver relative uptake value among patients in different Child-Pugh classes ( F = 122.05, P 〈 0. 01 ). Mean liver relative uptake value was highest in C hild-Pugh A group (1212 ± 168 ), followed by B group and C group (695 ± 161,234 ±55 ). In Child-Pugh A group,the relative enhancement index of SI to S8 was 1.13 ±. 22,1.12 ±0. 50,0. 81 ---0. 24,1.08 ±. 32, 1.41 ± 0. 25,1.10 ±0. 30,1.16 ±0. 41 and 1.17 ± 0. 23, respectively ( F = 5.93, P 〈 0.01 ). There was no significant difference in B and C group ( F = 1.95,1.83 ; P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Gadoxetate disodium- enhanced MRI can be used for evaluating whole liver function reserve quantitatively. This technique also has a potential value for evaluating of the segmental liver function reserve before partial hepatectomy.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期522-525,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
关键词 造影剂 磁共振成像 Liver Contrast media Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Fan ST. Liver functional reserve estimation : state of the art andrelevance for local treatments: the Eastern perspective. JHepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ,2010,17 : 380-384.
  • 2黄仲奎,陆力坚,龙莉玲.慢性肝病及其肝功能储备的扩散加权成像研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2010,44(12):1263-1267. 被引量:12
  • 3Kim T, Murakami T,Hasuike Y,et al. Experimental hepaticdysfunction : evaluation by MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA. J MagnReson Imaging,1997,7 : 683-688.
  • 4Ryeom HK,Kim SH,Kim JY,et al. Quantitative evaluation of liverfunction with MRI using Gd-EOB-DTPA. Korean J Radiol, 2004 ,5: 231-239.
  • 5Yamada A, Hara T, Fujinaga Y, et al. Quantitative evaluation ofliver function with use of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRimaging. Radiology,2011 ,260 : 727-733.
  • 6中华医学会传染病与,寄生虫病学分会,肝病学分会.病毒性肝炎防治方案[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2000,8(6):324-329. 被引量:14006
  • 7Van Beers BE,Pastor CM,Hussain HK. Primovist,Eovist: what toexpect. J Hepatol ,2012 ,57 ; 421-429.
  • 8黎一鸣,吕凡,吉鸿,白芝兰,雷团结.肝脏体积变化与病肝储备功能的关系研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2003,18(2):79-81. 被引量:66
  • 9董家鸿,郑树森,陈孝平,窦科峰,樊嘉,别平,耿小平,吕文平.肝切除术前肝脏储备功能评估的专家共识(2011版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2011,10(1):20-25. 被引量:334
  • 10Morris-Stiff G, Gomez D, Prasad R. Quantitative assessment ofhepatic function and its relevance to the liver surgeon. JGastrointest Surg 12009 ,13: 374-385.

二级参考文献36

共引文献14411

同被引文献204

引证文献23

二级引证文献180

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部