期刊文献+

美国高校绩效责任探析

An Analysis on Accountability of American University
下载PDF
导出
摘要 绩效责任是美国高校为了提高管理效率和教学质量而提出来的。绩效责任是高校利益相关者之间的一种整体问责。绩效责任加深了学术自由和学术自治之间的张力,迫使大学努力寻找责任与自由之间的平衡。绩效责任指标体系难以评定,评价日益复杂,明确定位大学发展目标有利于绩效责任的实现。同时,绩效责任也改变了大学的管理模式,通过大学文化的塑造,整合协调大学内部各种人员的利益关系,从而达到共同治理的目的。 Accountability is proposed for improving management efficiency and teaching quality. It is a whole accountability among stakeholders in colleges and universities. Accountability deepens the tension be- tween academic freedom and academic autonomy, forces the university to seek the balance between responsi- bility and freedom. The indicator system of accountability is hard to evaluate, and it is increasingly complicat- ed, defining the university's development objective is beneficial to countability also changes the university management mode, through realize the accountability. Meanwhile, ac- building the university cuhure, integrates the interest relation of staff in university, in order to reach co - governance.
作者 孙明英
出处 《高等理科教育》 2013年第3期63-68,共6页 Higher Education of Sciences
基金 湖南省社会基金项目"高校科研成果评估方法与指标体系构建研究"(项目编号:12JL12)阶段性成果
关键词 绩效责任 学术自由 大学治理 大学文化 accountability academic freedom university governance I university culture
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1希拉·斯劳特,拉里·莱斯利.学术资本主义——政治、政策和创业型大学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.198.
  • 2PAUL L. DRESSEL. The Autonomy of Public Colleges [ M . San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1980: 5.
  • 3阿赫巴特.2l世纪美国高等教育[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2005:74,83.
  • 4HILL P T, BONAN J. Decentralization and Accountability in Public Education [ M]. Washington DC: Rand, 1991: 58.
  • 5詹姆斯·杜德斯达.21世纪的大学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.40.235.
  • 6National Commission on Research. Accountability: Restoring the Quality of the Partership [ M]. Washington D C : NCP, 1980 : 17.
  • 7王景枝.美国公立高等教育绩效问责制的成效分析[J].高等工程教育研究,2011,59(4):120-123. 被引量:5
  • 8克拉克·克尔.大学之用[M].高锸,高戈,夕夕,译.5版.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
  • 9MICHAEL D. COHEN, JAMES D. MARCH, JOHAN P. OLSEN. Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972:1 -25.
  • 10迈克尔·夏托克.成功大学的管理之道[M].范怡红主译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006.124.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Burke,J. C. ,& Minassians, H.P. (2003). Real Ac- countability of Accountability Lite: Seventh Annual Survey, 2003. Albany, NY: The Rockefeller Institute of Govern- ment.
  • 2McLendon, M.K. & Hearn, J.C. & Deaton, R (2006). Called to Account: Analyzing the Origins and Spread of State Performance Accountability Policies for Higher Education. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis. (Vol. 28) No. 1.
  • 3Hearn,J. C. , Lewis, D. R. , Kallsen, L. , Holdsworth, J. M., & Jones, L. M. (2006). Incentives for Man- agedGrowth : A Case Sutdy of Incentive-- based Planning and Budgeting in a Large Public Research University. Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 286-316.
  • 4Leslie, D. W. , & Berdahl, R. O. (2008). The Politics of Restructuring Higher Education in Virginia: A Case Study. The Review of Higher Education, 31(3), 309-328.
  • 5Shin, Jung Cheol. Impacts of Performance--based Accounta- bility on Institutional Performance in the U.S. Higher Edu- cation, Vol. 60, No. 1. July 2010. Pp. 47-68.
  • 6Volkwein, J. F.. & Tandberg, D. A. (2008). Measuring Up: Examining the Connections among State StructuralCharacteristics, Regulatory Practices, and Performance. Research in Higher Education, 49, 180-197.
  • 7Huisman, J. ,& Currie, J. (2004). Accountability in High- er Education: Bridge over Troubled Water? Higher Educa- tion, 48, 529-521.
  • 8Dougherty, Kevin J. and Natow, Rebecca S. The Demise of Higher Education Performance Funding Systems in Three States. New York: Community College Research Centre, Columbia University. May 2009.
  • 9Christal, M. E. (1998). State Survey on Performance Measures; 1996-97. Denver, CO; State Higher Education Executive Officers/Education Commission of the States.
  • 10Romzek,B. S. (2000). Dynamics of Public Sector Account- ability in an Era of Reform. International Review of Admin- istrative Sciences, 66(1), 21-44.

共引文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部