摘要
目的对比分析耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)与甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)对复方新诺明(SXT)的耐药性。方法对2009年1月至2012年9月临床分离的522株金黄色葡萄球菌进行分析,细菌鉴定和药敏试验采用VITEK2Compact全自动细菌培养鉴定仪。根据金黄色葡萄球菌对SXT耐药或敏感,分为SXT耐药(SXT—R)组和SXT敏感(SXT—S)组,比较2组MRSA和MSSA对各抗菌药物的耐药性。结果MRSA与MSSA对万古霉素、替考拉宁、奎奴普丁/达福普汀、利奈唑胺、替加环素和呋喃妥因的耐药率均〈1.5%,且二者之间差异无统计学意义(均P〉0.05);MSSA对亚胺培南、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、利福平、莫西沙星、左旋氧氟沙星和环丙沙星的耐药率均〈9.1%,但MRSA的耐药率高达84.6%~100.0%,MSSA与MRSA比较差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。MRSA对SXT的耐药率[41.2%(127/308)]低于MSSA[57.9%(114/197)],差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。SXT—R组和SXT—S组中MRSA分离率分别为52.7%和68.6%。SXT—R组MSSA对氨苄西林/舒巴坦、亚胺培南、左旋氧氟沙星、环丙沙星、莫西沙星的耐药性低于SXT—S组[0(0.0)比25.0%(1/4),0(0.0)比25.0%(1/4),1.6%(1/63)比5.1%(4/79),6.1%(7/114)比10.8%(9/83),6.2%(7/113)比10.8%(9/83)],差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论MRSA对SXT的耐药率低于MSSA,SXT可作为治疗MRSA的可选药物之一。
Objective To compare and analyze the resistance of methicillin resistant staphylococcus anreus (MRSA) and methicillin sensitive staphylococcus aureus(MSSA) on cotrimoxazole(SXT). Methods On the Janu- ary 2009 to September 2012, 522 clinical isolates staphylococcus aureus were analyzed. The bacteria identification and drug sensitivity test were performed by VITEK 2 Compact automatic bacteria identification instrument. According to resistance or sensitive of staphylococcus aureus on SXT, 505 staphylococcus aureus were divided into SXT-R group and SXT-S group. Results The antibacterial activity of MRSA and MSSA on vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/ Dafoe Putin, linezolid, tigecycline and nitrofurantoin were better and the resistance rates were 〈 1.5% ; there were no significant differences( all P 〉 0.05 ). The resistance rates of MSSA on imipenem, ampicillin/ sulbactam, rifampicin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxac were 〈 9.1%, but resistance rates of MRSA were 84.6%-100.0% ; the difference was statistically significant (P 〈0.05). The MRSA isolating rates in SXT-R group and SXT-S group were 52.7% (127/241) and 68.6% (181/264). The resistance rates of MSSA on ampicillin / sul- bactam, imipenem, levofloxacin and ciprofloxac, moxifloxacin in SXT-R group were lower than those in SXT-S group [0(0.0) vs 25.0% (1/4), 0(0.0) vs 25.0% (1/4), 1.6% (1/63)vs 5.1% (4/79), 6.1% (7/l14)vs 10.8% (9/ 83 ), 6.2% (7/113) vs 10.8% (9/83) ; all P 〈 0.05 ]. Conclusion The resistance rate of MRSA on cotrimoxazole is lower than MSSA; cotrimoxazole can be used as one of alternative therapeutic agents in the treatment of MRSA.
出处
《中国医药》
2013年第7期998-1000,共3页
China Medicine
基金
基金项目:内蒙古自治区卫生厅医疗卫生科研计划项目(2010102)