摘要
《钱笺杜诗》所援引之诗话,率唐宋著述,明人止乎《升庵诗话》,然皆尽剔抉刮垢之能事,而无一字之褒扬。本文从异文、逸句、地理、诗句笺释四项,考释《钱笺》之举引《升庵诗话》,于升庵之发明,牧斋之辩证,皆重新阐述,援据立论,然后知《钱笺》之诟,诚非虚发。
In the period of the late-Ming ( 明 ) and early-Qing ( 清 ) dynasty, one can observe a vital change in academic atmosphere: the adoption of a concrete and open mind in conducting academic research which finally led to the flourish of textual research. This change in academic atmosphere can trace its origin to the scholars of the middle-Ming, especially Yang Shen (Sheng'an) (杨慎,升庵)-His Sheng'an Shi Hua( 《升庵诗话》) criticized the 'emptiness' of the Ming's academic research and had beneficial influence on many scholars. Qian Qianyi (Muzhai) ( 钱谦益,牧斋) was among those scholars and his Qian Jian Du Shi ( 《钱笺杜诗》 ) is an outstanding work of textual research in early-Qing , which , like Yang's work, emphasized creative and practical mind in academic researdh. In Qian Jian Du Shi, Qian only quoted one Ming scholar's opinions and this scholar was Yang, but, up to many people's surprise, Qian criticized Yang harshly and never said a good word on him. Why this happened if Yang was considered to be an all-round academic? This essay will look into this question by examining the quotations of Sheng'an Shi Hua in Qian Jian Du Shi and studying the academic developments during the late-Ming and early-Qing period.
出处
《西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2013年第4期11-20,共10页
Journal of Xihua University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)