期刊文献+

非球面衍射型多焦人工晶状体临床应用观察 被引量:1

Clinical observation of the effects of Acrysoft IQ ReSTOR +3D IOL
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察非球面衍射型多焦人工晶状体(Acrysoft IQ ReSTOR+3D IOL)的临床效果。方法2011年10月至2012年10月间,白内障超声乳化吸除Acrysoft IQ ReSTOR+3 D IOL植入患者在排除影响术后视力的因素共55例(83只眼)作为观察组,并在观察组标准基础上选取同期植入Alcon Acrsoft SN60AT IOL 33例(42只眼)作为对照组。观察患者术后反应、主观感觉、远、近视力、对比敏感度(CS),随访时间均在6个月以上。结果二组术后反应基本相同,视觉异常出现率ReSTOR组在术后2周高于对照组(P<0.05),术后1个月、6个月差异无显著性(P>0.05),术后1个月、6个月观察组裸眼远视力≥0.6者为96.39%、96.00%,≥1.0者为45.78%、46.67%,与对照组比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。术后1个月、6个月观察组裸眼近视力≥0.6者为96.39%、97.33%,≥1.0者为21.69%、22.67%,明显优于对照组6.25%、7.14%、0%、0%(P<0.001)。在术后1个月和6个月时,对照组在各空间频率均高于观察组。仅高空间频率(18 c.d-1),1个月时观察组CS值明显低于对照组,2组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组CS随时间延长而提高,1个月和6个月之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论非球面衍射型多焦人工晶状体(Acrysoft IQ ReSTOR+3D IOL)可为患者提供良好的裸眼远、近视力,术后视觉异常出现率低。 Objective ToobservetheeffectsdAcrysdtIQReSTOR +3DIOL. Methods All patients were di- vided into two groups: Aerysdt IQ ReSTOR + 3D IOL group recruited 55 patients ( 83 eyes ) eyes that received phacoemul- sitication and were implanted with Acrysoft IQ ReSTOR + 3D IOL from October 2011 to October 2012. Another 33 patients (42 eyes) received phacoemulsification and were implanted with A]con Acrsoft SN60AT IOL served as a control/8nmp. Postoperative subjective visual functlonality, distant and near visual acuifies, and contrast sensitivity ( CS ) were followed up for at least 6 mceths and were analyzed. Results Subjective visual functionality and uncorrected distant visual acuilies were not diffexent between the two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ) at 1 month and 6 months after the treatment. Uncorrected near visu- al acuities were markedly improved in patients implanted with Acrysoft IQ ReSTOR + 3D IOL. By 1 month and 6 months, contrast sensitivity was better in Acrysdt IQ ReSTOR + 3D IOL group at all spatial frequencies. The only exception was at 1 month CS at high upatlal frequency ( 18 c/d) was lower in cizervafional group. CS tended to improve with time in pa- tients implanted with Acrysoft IQ ReSTOR + 3D IOL, with a sign/ficantly better CS at 6 month than at 1 month ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Acrysoft IQ ReSTOB + 3D IOL can provide a high level outcomes in both distant and near uncorrected visions with low incidence of visual symptoms
出处 《临床眼科杂志》 2013年第3期205-207,共3页 Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
关键词 多焦点人工晶状体 超声乳化白内障吸除术 视功能 Muhlfocal in lens Phacoemulsification Visual quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Steiment RF, Aker BL, Trentaoost DJ, et al. A prospective com?parative study cI the AMO array zooal-p rogressive mutifocal sili?cone intraocular lens and a lIIOIIOfocal intraocular lens. Ophthal?mology, 1999, 106: 1243-1254.
  • 2李霞,谭少健,梁皓,李伟均,苗重会.多焦点人工晶体眼视功能的研究[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2005,23(1):39-44. 被引量:34
  • 3赵云娥,张国亮,王勤美,瞿佳.多焦点人工晶状体植入术后视功能的观察[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,41(4):369-370. 被引量:33
  • 4Zelichow aka B, Rekas M, Stankiewicz A, et al. R. Apodi-J dif?fractive versus refractive multifocal in traocular lenses: Optical and visual evaluation. J Cataract Refract Swg , 2008 ,34 :2036-2042.
  • 5Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES,et al. Perfonnance cI AcrySof ReSfOR apodi-J diffractive IOL: aprospective compara tive trial Am. Am J OphthalmoI,2006,141 :827-832.
  • 6Rocha KM, Chalita MR, et al. Postoper8tive wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity cI amultifocal apodized dif£ractive IOL ( Re?STOR ) and three monofocal IOLs. J Refract Swg,2005 ,21 :808- 812.
  • 7A MJL, TavolatoM, De Is Hoz F, et al. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoeccommoda- ting and multifocal refractive and diffractive in traocular lenses: compara?tive c -linical study. J Cataract Refract Swg,2004,30:2494-2503.
  • 8Mester U, Hunold W, Wesendahl T ,et al. Functional outcomes af?ter implant- tation cI Teenis ZM900 and AIray SA40 multifocal in traocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Swg,2007 ,33: 1033-1040.

二级参考文献22

  • 1王海林,关家璓,凡长春,陶军.人工晶体位置及类型与伪调节的关系[J].中国实用眼科杂志,1995,13(5):284-286. 被引量:8
  • 2Lim JI, Kuppermann BD, Gwon A, et al. Vitrenretinal surgery through multifocal intraocular lenses compared with monofocal intraocular lenses in fluid - Pilled and air - filled rabbit eyes. Ophthalmology, 2000, 107 (6) : 1083 - 1088.
  • 3Keates RH, Pearce JL, Schneider RT. Clinical results of the multifocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1987, 13 (5) : 557--560.
  • 4Pieh S, Weghaupt H, Skorpik C. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability with diffractive and refractivemultifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998, 24 (5): 659--662.
  • 5Ravalico G. Parentin F, Sirotti P, et al. Analysis of light energy distribution by multifocal intraocular lenses throughan experimental optical model. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998, 24 (5): 647 652.
  • 6Steinert RF, Aker BL, Trentacost Dj, et al. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal - progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology, 1999, 106 (7): 1243--1255.
  • 7Dick HB, Krist R, Schwenn O, et al. Near vision after implantation of monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lenses. Kiln Monatsbl Augenheilkd, 2001, 218 (6): 406--411.
  • 8Walkow L, Klemen UM. Patient satisfaction after implantation of diffractive designed multifocal intraocular lenses in dependence on objective parameters. Grades Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2001,239 (9): 683--687.
  • 9Walkow T. Liekfeld A. Anders N. et al. A prospective evaluation of a diffractive versus a refractive designed multifocal intraocularlens. Ophthalmology. 1997, 104 (9): 1380--1386.
  • 10Kamlesh, Dadeya S, Kaushik S. Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Can J Ophthalmol, 2001, 36 (4): 197--201.

共引文献60

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部