期刊文献+

利用不同轴承计算模型预测发动机振动噪声的比较 被引量:4

Comparison of engine body NVH predicted by different bearing calculation models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究不同轴承计算模型对发动机振动噪声预测的影响,该文以493ZLQ柴油机为例,分别建立了带HD(hydro-dynamic)、EHD(elastic hydro-dynamic)以及TEHD(thermal elastic hydro-dynamic)轴承计算模型的发动机多体动力学模型;分析了不同模型下最大油膜压力、最小油膜厚度,发现相对TEHD轴承计算模型,HD轴承计算模型最小油膜厚度和最大油膜压力的相对误差为-68%、130%,EHD轴承计算模型的相对误差为84%、-9%;以不同模型的多体动力学计算结果为边界条件预测了发动机机体的声学性能;分别将振动计算结果与声学计算结果与试验结果进行了对比,发现HD、EHD以及TEHD轴承计算模型得到的振动噪声计算结果的最大误差分别为7、4.5和4.2dB,声功率级计算结果的最大误差分别为13、6.1、3.8dBA。研究表明,考虑轴承的弹性变形以及热变形的发动机多体动力学计算模型在发动机振动与噪声计算方面具有很高的计算精度,是目前分析轴承受力以及发动机噪声领域最为准确的计算模型之一。 A highly strengthened engine is the mainstream of the engine industr's future development;however,with increasing performance enhancements of the engine,the engine NVH issues will become increasingly more serious.Engine NVH problems will seriously affect the durability and comfort of the vehicle,therefore the noise and vibration reduction work of strengthening the engines is receiving more and more attention.How to solve these problems has become an important responsibility of internal combustion engine workers.As we know,reasonable analysis and diagnosis becomes the key to controlling the engine vibration and noise,so numerical analysis methods become an important means.Since current analysis models cannot meet the design requirements for high reinforcing Engine,it is necessary to improve the current method to find more accurate engine harshness(NVH) performance prediction model.According to previous research,the dynamic characteristic of bearing became crucial to predict the engine NVH performance.In order to study the effects of different bearing calculation models on engine vibration and acoustic prediction,and taking a four cylinder diesel engine as an example,the engine multi-body dynamics models coupling with HD(hydro-dynamic,HD) bearing model,EHD(elastic hydro-dynamic,EHD) bearing model,and TEHD(thermal elastic hydro-dynamic,TEHD) bearing model were respectively proposed in this paper.The maximum oil film pressure and minimum film thickness of different calculation models were analyzed at the engine rated operating conditions,and the results showed that,relative to the TEHD bearing model,the deviations of minimum film thickness and the maximum oil film pressure of the HD bearing model were-68% and 130%,respectively,and the deviations of minimum film thickness and the maximum oil film pressure of the EHD bearing model were 84%and-9%,respectively.These results revealed that bearing thermodynamic properties could significantly affect the bearing lubrication performance,which could not be ignored in the bearing lubrication analysis.With multi-body dynamics calculation results as the boundary condition,the engine body NVH performance was predicted.In the meantime,the surface of the engine body vibration acceleration was measured on the bench test,and the engine body radiated noise was calculated by vibration velocity method.Following this,the experimental and calculated values of the engine noise and vibration were compared to validate the calculation models.The comparison showed that the maximum vibration errors of the HD model,EHD model,and TEHD model are 7dB,4.5dB,and 4.2dB,respectively,and the maximum acoustic errors of the HD model,EHD model,and TEHD model are 13dB,6.1dB,and 3.8dBA,respectively.The results of this study showed that the bearing thermodynamic properties will not only affect the lubrication performance results,but also significantly affect the engine NVH performance prediction.After considering the elastic deformation and thermal deformation of bearing,the engine dynamics calculation model has high calculation precision in the engine vibration and noise predictions.Although the method requires more computation time,it is one of the most accurate calculation models in the main bearing force and engine noise analysis field.
出处 《农业工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期64-70,共7页 Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基金 国家十二五科技支撑计划资助项目(2011BAE22B05)
关键词 发动机 轴承 动力学 噪声 边界元法 engines bearings dynamics noise boundary element method
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Perera M,Theodossiades S,Rahnejat H.Elasto-multi-body dynamics of internal combustionengines with tribological conjunctions[J]. Proceedings ofthe Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part K-joumal ofMulti-body Dynamics,2010,224(K3):261-277.
  • 2Novotny P,Pistek V. New efficient methods forpowertrain vibration analysis[J]. Proceedings of theInstitution of Mechanical Engineers Part D-Journal ofAutomobile Engineering,2010,224(D5):611-629.
  • 3Zhang J H,Han J. Cae process to simulate and optimiseengine noise and vibration[J],Mechanical Systems andSignal Processing,2006,20(6):1400-1409.
  • 4贾维新,郝志勇,杨金才.虚拟预测方法在柴油机低噪声设计中的应用[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2007,41(3):489-493. 被引量:19
  • 5杨陈,郝志勇,陈馨蕊.柴油机机体辐射噪声预测及低噪声改进设计[J].江苏大学学报(自然科学版),2008,29(4):301-303. 被引量:15
  • 6李民,舒歌群,卫海桥.发动机安装条件对多体动力学计算影响的研究[J].内燃机工程,2009,30(4):63-67. 被引量:6
  • 7苏铁熊,杨世文,崔志琴,李小雷,张保成,张翼.复杂结构结合部动力学仿真模型研究[J].华北工学院学报,2001,22(3):218-222. 被引量:21
  • 8Bukovnik S,Dorr N,Caika V,et al. Analysis of diversesimulation models for combustion engine journalbearings and the influence of oil condition[J]. TribologyInternational,2006,39(8):820-826.
  • 9Oh K P,Goenka P K. Elastohydrodynamic solution ofjournal bearings under dynamic loading[J]. Journal ofTribology,1985,107(3):389-395.
  • 10Kim B J,Kim K W. Thermo-elastohydrodynamicanalysis of connecting rod bearing in internal combustionengine [J]. Journal of Tribology,2001,123(3):444-454.

二级参考文献40

共引文献107

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部