期刊文献+

肾动态显像联合尿微量蛋白诊断红斑狼疮早期肾损害的价值探讨 被引量:2

Diagnostic Value of Renal Dynamic Imaging and Urinary Trace Protein in Patients with Lupus Nephritis at Early Stage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨^(99)Tc^m-DTPA肾动态显像、尿微量蛋白联合检测对狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者的早期诊断价值。方法正常对照组20例,实验组为SL,E患者42例,其中有肾脏表现组30例,无肾脏表现组12例。以^(99)Tc^m-DTPA肾动态显像观察肾小球滤过率(GFR),放免法检测尿微量蛋白。结果 SLE患者有肾脏表现组的GFR值和尿微量蛋白与无肾脏表现组、对照组比较,差异均有显著性(P<0.001);无肾脏表现组GFR值与对照组相比差异无显著性(P>0.05),但尿微量蛋白与对照组相比差异有显著性(P<0.05)。有肾脏表现组GFR诊断阳性率为91.5%,无肾脏表现组GFR诊断阳性率为80.4%,而肾动态显像、尿微量蛋白联合检测的诊断阳性率为98.4%.结论肾动态显像、尿微量蛋白联合检测可作为SLE患者早期肾功能损伤的检测指标,诊断准确性优于单纯肾功能显像。 Objective The aim of this paper is to explore diagnostic value of renal dynamic imaging and uri- nary trace protein in patients with lupus nephritis at early stage. Methods Twenty normal persons and forty-two patients with LN were examined by ^99Tc^m-DTPA renal dynamic imaging and urinary trace protein. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group named silent lupus nephritis( SLN ) including 30 patients. The other group named obvious lu- pus nephritis(OLN ) including 12 patients. In each case,all the items including glomerular filtration rate(GFR) ,urinary trace protein were observed. Results There was obvious difference between normal person and two groups of LN patients in GFR and urinary trace protein( P 〈 0. 001 ) , there was no difference between normal persons and SLN patients in GFR (P 〉 0.05 ) obvious in urinary trace protein { P 〈 0.05 ). The positive rate was 91.5 % in SLN patients, and 80.4% in OLN patients by GFR,but 98.4% by GFR and urinary trace protein on the same time. Conclusion ^99Tc^m-DTPA renal dynamic imaging and urinary trace protein are a very efficient way to evaluate renal function for LN patients at early stage, and better than simple renal dynamic imaging.
作者 谢海
出处 《潍坊医学院学报》 2013年第3期203-204,共2页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
关键词 肾动态显像 红斑狼疮肾炎 尿微量蛋白 GFR Renal dynamic imaging LN Urinary trace protein GFR
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1Zabaleta-Lanz M,Vargas-Arenas RE,Tapanes F, et al. Silent nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus, 2003,12:26-30.
  • 2Moroni G,Pasquali S,Quaglini S,et al.Clinical and prognostic value of serial renal biopsies in lupus nephritis. Am J Kidney Dis,1999,34:530-539.
  • 3Neulders Q,Jackson M,Cohen R,et al. Association of chronic interstitial cystitis,protein-losing enteropathy and paralytic ileus with seronegative systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Nephron,1992,37:239-244.
  • 4Mercadal L,Montcel ST,Nochy D,et al. Factors affecting outcome and prognosis in membranous lupus nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2002,17:1771-1778.
  • 5Balow JE,Boumpas DT,Austin HA,et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus and kidney. In:Lahita RG,ed. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 1999.657-685.
  • 6Tan EM,Cohen AS,Fries JF,et al.The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum, 1982,25:1271-1277.
  • 7Nossent H,Henzen-Logmans M,Vroom T,et al. Contribution of renal biopsy data in predicting outcome in lupus nephritis:analysis of 116 patients. Arthritis Rheum, 1990,33:970-977.
  • 8Bombardier C,Gladman DD,Vrowitz MB,et al. Derivation of the SLEDAI..a disease activity index for lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum, 1992,35:630-640.
  • 9Mintz G,Rodriguez-Alvarez E.Systemic lupus erythematosus.Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 1989,15:266-274.
  • 10Austin HA Ⅲ ,Muenz LR,Joyce KM,et al. Prognostic factors in lupus nephritis:contribution of renal histologic data. Am J Med,1983,75:382-391.

共引文献49

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部