2011年度我国大陆地区、日本、韩国皮肤科学发表的英文文章现状比较

Comparison of current publication statuses in dermatology among China's Mainland,Japan and South Korea

目的:比较2011年度我国大陆地区、日本、韩国发表皮肤科英文文章的现状。方法:在Pub Med上搜索2011年1月1日—2011年12月3 1日的皮肤科学文章,删去其中在线发表和其他年限发表的以及非英文文章,并进行分析。结果:日本皮肤科发表文章数量最多(434篇),我国大陆地区皮肤科发表文章的数量最少(267篇);我国大陆地区皮肤科发表的文章平均每篇影响因子最高(2.75±0.22),韩国最低(1.253±0.06);我国大陆地区皮肤科发表文章人均产值所得影响因子最高(165.46/1 000美元),日本和韩国分别为23.54/1 000美元和21.11/1 000美元。结论:我国大陆地区皮肤科学者发表文章数量虽少,但影响因子高。

Objective： To compare the current publication statuses in dermatology among China's Mainland, Japan and South Korea. Methods： All publication data were from www.pubmed.com. Only papers formally published in English in 2011 were used for analysis. Results： Japan published 434 papers in dermatology in 2011 while South Korea and China's Mainland pub- lished 346 and 267, respectively. The average impact factor per paper from China's Mainland was significantly higher than that from South Korea （2.75±0.22 vs. 1.25±0.06, P〈0.001）. There was no difference in the average impact factor per paper between China's Mainland and Japan （2.33±0.10）. The average impact factor per USS1 000 gross domestic product per capita was 165.46 for China's Mainland. The average impact factor per USS1 000 gross domestic product per capita for Japan and South Korea were 23.54 and 21.11, respectively. Conculsions： The present study suggests that although the dermatological researchers in China's Mainland have published less papers, but publication quality is higher.