期刊文献+

妊娠母猪群养模式成功与否的探讨 被引量:3

A Review of Success and Failure Factors for Group Housing of Sows in Pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国很多养猪场的妊娠母猪采取群养方式,群养模式具有节约空间和提高福利水平的优点,但与单体栏饲养模式相比,人们可能还会考虑群养模式下的妊娠母猪生产性能、争斗和健康等方面,此外,我们也发现在母猪生产力、肢蹄问题、和福利等方面得出决定性结论的文献也比较少,因此,本文主要描述了群养模式下不同给料方式、地面质量和垫料等因素对妊娠母猪行为、生理、损伤、免疫和繁殖性能等方面的影响并结合我们多年的生产实践经验,提出了一系列实践性的建议,目的是提高当前我国群养模式下的妊娠母猪生产力和福利水平。 At present ,the number of farmers adopting group housing of sows are increasing in China. Group housing of sows can save space and improve the welfare level, but compare with individual systems, production performance, fighting and health may also be a problem of concern. In addition,The reviews on these aspects are limited, therefore, this paper mainly describes the effects of different feeding modes, floor quality and padding on the pregnant sows behavior, physiology, damage, immune and performance based on several years production experiences. It proposed a series of practical recommendations to improve wel- fare and reproduction in group housed sows.
出处 《家畜生态学报》 北大核心 2013年第5期85-88,共4页 Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology
基金 黑龙江省科技攻关项目(猪健康养殖新模式GA09B301-7)
关键词 群养 妊娠母猪 建议 福利 group housing pregnant sows recommendations welfare
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1CIWF. Animal welfare aspects of good agricultural practice, pigproduction[M]. Http-//www. ciwf. org,2006.
  • 2Chapinal N. Evaluation of welfare and productivity in pregnantsows kept in stalls or in 2 different group housing systems[J].Appl Anim Behav Sci,2010 ?76 : 105-117.
  • 3Chapinal N. Feeder use patterns in group-housed pregnantsows fed with an unprotected electronic sow feeder (Fitmix)[J]. Appl Anim Welf Sci,2005,11(4) : 319-336.
  • 4Frank A M,Tuyttens Ester Struelens,Suzy Van Gansbeke, etal. Factors influencing farmers' responses to welfare legisla-tion: A case study of gestation sow housing in Flanders (Bel-gium) [J]. Livestock Science?2008,116(1-3) :289-299.
  • 5Hulbert L E,McGlonek J J. Evaluation of drop versus trickle-feeding systems for crated or group-penned gestating sows[J].Anim Sci,2008,86(3) : 790.
  • 6Chapinal N. Aggressive behavior in two different group-hous-ing systems for pregnant sows [ J]. Appl Anim Behav Sci,2007,76: 105-117.
  • 7Pol F. Urinary cortisol as an additional tool to assess the wel-fare of pregnant sows kept in two types of housing [J]. VetRes,2002,33(1)=13-22.
  • 8Merlot E,Mounier A M,Prunier A. Endocrine response of giltsto various common stressors: a comparison of indicators andmethods of analysis [J]. Physiol Behav, 2011, 102 ( 3-4) : 259-.
  • 9Anil L. Comparison of injuries in sows housed in gestationstalls versus group pens with electronic sow feeders [J]. AmVet Med Assoc,2003 ,223(9) : 1 334-1 338.
  • 10Lammers P J,Honeyman M S, Mabry J W,et al. Performanceof gestating sows in bedded hoop barns and confinement stalls[J]. Anim Sci,2007,85 :1 311-1 317.

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部