期刊文献+

Predicting the dynamics of local adaptation in invasive species 被引量:1

Predicting the dynamics of local adaptation in invasive species
下载PDF
导出
摘要 An invasive plant species may restrict its spread to only one type of habitat, or, after some time, may continue to spread into a different, often stressful, secondary, habitat. The question of whether evolution is required for an invasive species to spread from one habitat to another is currently hotly debated. In order for local adaptation to occur, genetic variation must be present within invasive populations. In this paper, I focus on the effect of habitat on the maintenance of genetic variation during the lag phase, the phase of population stability prior to expansion. Genetic diversity in invasive plant populations accumulates through multiple introductions, gene flow, mutation, and hybridization, but diversity is maintained by population level processes influencing effective population size (Ne). I show that when the plastic response to the environment results in little variation in reproductive output among indi- viduals, Ne is maximized and genetic variation is maintained. Established models of plant competition show that below-ground competition reduces the variation in reproductive output, whereas competition for light increases variation in reproductive output. The same environments that maintain high Ne also reduce the opportunity for se- lection and minimize the response to selection, and thus the effects of the environment are synchronized to prevent genetic purges. When the primary invasion habitat supports high Ne, conditions are ripe for local adaptation to a secondary habitat, particularly if the secondary habitat has high opportunity for selection. When the primary invasion habitat supports low Ne, genetic diversity is less likely to be sufficient for local adaptation to secondary habitat to occur. An invasive plant species may restrict its spread to only one type of habitat, or, after some time, may continue to spread into a different, often stressful, secondary, habitat. The question of whether evolution is required for an invasive species to spread from one habitat to another is currently hotly debated. In order for local adaptation to occur, genetic variation must be present within invasive populations. In this paper, I focus on the effect of habitat on the maintenance of genetic variation during the lag phase, the phase of population stability prior to expansion. Genetic diversity in invasive plant populations accumulates through multiple introductions, gene flow, mutation, and hybridization, but diversity is maintained by population level processes influencing effective population size (Ne). I show that when the plastic response to the environment results in little variation in reproductive output among indi- viduals, Ne is maximized and genetic variation is maintained. Established models of plant competition show that below-ground competition reduces the variation in reproductive output, whereas competition for light increases variation in reproductive output. The same environments that maintain high Ne also reduce the opportunity for se- lection and minimize the response to selection, and thus the effects of the environment are synchronized to prevent genetic purges. When the primary invasion habitat supports high Ne, conditions are ripe for local adaptation to a secondary habitat, particularly if the secondary habitat has high opportunity for selection. When the primary invasion habitat supports low Ne, genetic diversity is less likely to be sufficient for local adaptation to secondary habitat to occur.
出处 《Journal of Arid Land》 SCIE CSCD 2013年第3期268-274,共7页 干旱区科学(英文版)
关键词 CANALIZATION phenotypic plasticity population expansion secondary invasion canalization phenotypic plasticity population expansion secondary invasion
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Alexander J M, Kueffer C, Daehler C C, et al. 2011. Assembly of nonnative floras along elevational gradients explained by directional ecological filtering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(2): 656-661.
  • 2Arnold S J, Wade M J. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution, 38(4): 709-719.
  • 3Christiansen F B. 1990. Simplified models for viability selection at multiple loci. Theoretical Population Biology, 37: 39-54.
  • 4Colautti R I, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich I A, et al. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis Ecology Letters, 7: 721-733.
  • 5Crow J F, Denniston C. 1988. Inbreeding and variance effective population numbers. Evolution, 42(3): 482-495.
  • 6Crow J F. 1989. Fitness variation in natural populations. In: Hill W G, Mackay T F C. Evolution and Animal Breeding: Reviews on Molecular and Quantitative Approaches in Honor of Alan Robertson, Wallingford: CAB International, 91-97.
  • 7Davis M A, Grime P J, Thompson K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invisibility. Journal of Ecology, 88(3): 528-534.
  • 8Dietz H, Edwards P J. 2006. Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology, 87(6): 1359-1367.
  • 9Dlugosch K M, Parker I M. 2008a. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Molecular Ecology, 17: 431-449.
  • 10Dlugosch K M, Parker I M. 2008b. Invading populations of an ornamental shrub show rapid life history evolution despite genetic bottlenecks. Ecology Letters, 11: 701-709.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部