期刊文献+

开环式吻合器痔上黏膜切除术与痔上黏膜环切术治疗重度痔病的效果比较 被引量:17

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较开环式吻合器痔上黏膜切除术(TST术)与痔上黏膜环切术(PPH术)治疗重度痔病的临床疗效。方法将60例重度痔病患者随机分成TST术与PPH术治疗各30例。观察两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、疼痛程度、术中出血量、术后排便失禁程度(FISI)、术后排便梗阻程度(ODS),随访时间为1个月。结果疼痛程度、术后1个月排便失禁程度TST术组明显少于PPH术组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院时间、术后1个月改善排便梗阻的程度,在TST术组与PPH术组之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 TST疗效显著,比起PPH术,并发症轻,近期效果好。
出处 《广东医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第11期1729-1731,共3页 Guangdong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1杨新庆,刘学东,卢声琦.痔的现代概念及诊治现状[J].中国实用外科杂志,2001,21(1):30-32. 被引量:80
  • 2HO Y H, CHEONG W K,TSANG C,et al. Stapled hemorrhoid-ectomy一cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial in-eluding incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanalultrasound assessments at up to three months[ J]. Dis Colon Rec-tum, 2000, 43(12) : 1666 -1675.
  • 3GARCEA G, SUTTON C D, LLOYD T D,et al. Management ofbenign rectal strictures[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2003,46 (11):1451 - 1460.
  • 4姚礼庆,钟芸诗,许剑民,周平红,徐美东,宋陆军,刘厚宝.吻合器痔上黏膜钉合术后直肠狭窄[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(13):897-899. 被引量:55
  • 5SENAGORE A J,SINGER M, ABCARIAN H, et al. A prospective,randomized,controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoi-dopexy and ferguson hemorrhoidectomy perioperative and one - yearresults[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004, 47(11) : 1824 -1836.
  • 6ROCKWOOD T H,CHURCH J M, FLESHMAN J W, et al. Pa-tient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associatedwith fecal incontinence[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1999 , 42( 12):1525 -1532.
  • 7AGACHAN F, CHEN T, PFEIFER J, et al. A constipation sco-ring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipatedpatients[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1996, 39(6) : 681 -685.
  • 8傅传刚.重视PPH在痔治疗中的合理应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(6):436-437. 被引量:79
  • 9姚礼庆,唐竞,等.吻合器粘膜环切要治疗重度痔的临床价值[J].中国肛肠病杂志,2002,22(3):7-9. 被引量:78
  • 10王业皇,章阳,严进,康雨龙,童景飞,雷超.开环式微创痔吻合器治疗痔病的临床效果[J].江苏医药,2010,36(11):1249-1252. 被引量:56

二级参考文献36

共引文献354

同被引文献119

  • 1何广.应用国产吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗痔的临床疗效[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(9):230-231. 被引量:1
  • 2痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2100
  • 3巴雅尔.改良PPH术结合外痔切除治疗重度混合痔手术体会(附42例手术体会)[A].中华中医药学会.中国肛肠病研究心得集[C].中华中医药学会:2011:2.
  • 4Goldstein SD, Meslin KP, Mazza T, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: outcome assessment [ J ]. Am Surg, 2007,73 (7) : 733-736.
  • 5Ganio E,Altomare DF, Milito G, et al. Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trim of stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy [J]. Br J Surg, 2007,94(8) : 1033-1037.
  • 6Pigot F,Dao-Quang M,Castinel A,et al. Low hemorrhoidopexy staple line does not improve results and increases risk for incontinence[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2006,10(4) :329-333.
  • 7Inoue Y, Kobayashi M, Yoshiyama S, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing a 3- versus 6-stitch purse-string suture in stapled hemorrhoidopexv[ J ]. Dig Sur~, 2007,24( 5 ) : 382-387.
  • 8Elmr SE,Nygren JO,Lenander CE.A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2013,56(4):484-490.
  • 9Van Turenhout ST,Oor FA,Terhaar Sive Droste JS,et al.Hemorrhoids detected at colonoscopy:An infrequent cause of false-positive fecal immunochemical test results[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2012,76(1):136-143.
  • 10郝东鹏.闰新雍.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与传统痔疮切除术治疗痔疮的临床疗效对比研究[J].中国中医药科技,2014.21(z1):19-20.

引证文献17

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部