期刊文献+

供体细胞、去核方法以及TSA处理对巴马小型猪手工克隆胚胎发育的影响 被引量:1

Influences of Different Donor Cells, Enucleation Methods and TSA Treatments on the in vitro Development of Handmade Cloned Embryos of Guangxi Bama Minipig
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文用不同的供体细胞、去核方法以及TSA处理浓度研究其对巴马小型猪手工克隆胚发育的影响,试验结果发现:克隆胚的发育率在相同代次的不同供体细胞之间,极体定向和化学辅助去核法之间均无显著性差异(p>0.05);TSA浓度为40nmol/L时克隆胚的囊胚率最高,但与对照组相比无显著性差异(p>0.05)。这说明三种供体细胞均能支持巴马小型猪克隆胚的早期发育,化学辅助和极体定向去核法均为较好的去核方法。 The cloned embryos were constructed with different donor cells, enucleation methods and then treat-ment with different concentration of TSA in order to evaluate their potential effects on the development of Guangxi Bama Minipig handmade cloned embryos in vitro. It was showed that the development rate of handmade cloned embryos were not only similar between the three groups of cell types with the same generation, but also be- tween the chemically assisted handmade enucleation (CAHE) and polar body-oriented-handmade enucleation (OHE) groups (p〉0.05). Although the blastocyst rate in the 40 nmol/L TSA group was higher, there was no significant dif- ference among the control and other groups. It is concluded that the three kinds of donor cells could well support in vitro embryonic development ofBama minipig handmade cloned embryos, CAHE and OHE could both be the enucleation method for handmade cloning.
出处 《基因组学与应用生物学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期296-302,共7页 Genomics and Applied Biology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31260553) 亚热带农业生物资源保护与利用国家重点实验室开放课题(SB1001)共同资助
关键词 供体类型 去核方法 TSA 手工核移植 巴马小型猪 Cell type, Enucleation method, TSA, Hand made cloning, Bama Minipig
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献50

共引文献33

同被引文献26

  • 1Aigner B., R enner S., Kessler B., Klymiuk N., Kurome M., Wunsch A., and Wolf E., 2010, Transgenic pigs as models for translational biomedical research, Journal of Molecular Medicine, 88(7): 653-664.
  • 2Capecchi M.R., 1980, High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells, Cell, 22(Pt 2): 479-488.
  • 3Chailertvanitkul V.N., and Pouton C.W., 2010, Adenovirus: A blueprint for non-viral gene delivery, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 21(5): 627-632.
  • 4Dalby B., Cates S., Harris A., Ohki E.C., Tilkins M.L., Price P.J., and Ciccaronec V.C., 2004, Advanced transfection with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent: Primary neurons, siRNA, and high-throughput applications, Methods, 33(2): 95-103.
  • 5Escriou V., Ciolina C., Helbling-Leclerc A., Wils P., and Scher- man D., 1998, Cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer: Analy- sis of cellular uptake and nuclear import of plasmid DNA, Cell Biology and Toxicology, 14(2): 95-104.
  • 6Farhood H., Bottega R., Epand R.M., and Huang L., 1992, Effect of cationic cholesterol derivatives on gene transfer and pro- tein kinase C activity, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1111 (2): 239-246.
  • 7Gao X., and Huang L., 1991, A novel cationic liposome reagent for efficient transfection of mammalian cells, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 179(1): 280-285.
  • 8Guo H.C., Hao R.Z., Wei Y.Q., Sun D.H., Sun S.Q., and Zhang Z.C., 2012, Optimization of electrotransfection conditions of mammalian cells with different biological features, J. Mem- brane. Biol., 245(12): 789-795.
  • 9Kneuer C., Sameti M., Bakowsky U., Schiestel T., Schirra H., Schmidt H., and Lehr C.M., 2000, A nonviral DNA delivery system based on surface modified silica-nanoparticles can efficiently transfect cells in vitro, Bioconjugate Chem., 11 (6): 926-932.
  • 10Lai L.X., and Prather R.S., 2003, Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors, Cloning and Stem Cells, 5(4): 233-241.

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部