期刊文献+

育龄期妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变锥切治疗后切缘阳性的高危因素分析 被引量:5

Analysis of the risk factors in cutting edge positive after taper cutting treatment of the childbearing age women cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈环形电切术(LEEP)及宫颈冷刀锥切术(CKC)治疗育龄期妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)后切缘阳性的高危因素。方法回顾2007年1月~2011年11月在我院经阴道镜活检初步诊断为CIN(包括CIN1,CIN2,CIN3)的患者265例,年龄30~49岁,经宫颈锥切治疗后,切缘阳性者32例,切缘阴性者233例,随访1年,于术后6个月、12个月复查TCT,HPV,必要时行阴道镜、活检及进一步手术治疗。结果切缘阳性组年龄明显大于切缘阴性组(P<0.05);切缘阳性组的HPV负荷量明显高于切缘阴性组;切缘阳性组的术前TCT结果以HSIL(上皮内高度病变)为主,与切缘阴性组有统计学差异(P<0.05);病变累及腺体者的百分比在两组无明显差异(P>0.05),诊断CIN的级别,诊断CIN3者在切缘阳性组明显多于切缘阴性组(P<0.05)。结论育龄期妇女的年龄(≥40岁)、HPV负荷量(≥500)、TCT病变程度(≥HSIL)、诊断高级别CIN(CIN3)是CIN切缘阳性的高危因素。切缘阳性与病变复发/持续有关。在术前,对这部分高危患者安排有经验的医生进行,手术时谨慎操作,结合患者生育情况适当扩大手术范围,如果各种原因导致再次锥切不可能时,CIN3切缘阳性的患者可行子宫全切术,对于要求保留生育功能的患者应严密随访。 Objective To investigate the effect of LEEP and cervical cold knife conization (CKC) for treatment of women of childbearing age of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias after margin risk factors of positive. Methods A retrospective in 2007 January to 2011 November in our hospital were diagnosed by colposcope CIN (including CIN1, CIN2, CIN3) in 265 cases of patients, aged between 30 to 49 years old, after cervical conization after treatment, 32 cases with positive margin, 233 cases with negative margins, follow-up of 1 years, after June, December review of TCT, HPV, if necessary, colposcopy, biopsy and further operation treatment. Results The positive margin group was significantly greater than the negative margin group (P 〈 0.05). HPV load margin positive group was significantly higher than negative margin group; positive margin group in the preoperative TCT results in HSIL (HSIL), there was significant difference with negative margin group (P 〈 0.05); lesions gland involvement in the percentage of no significant difference between the two groups (P 〉 0.05), diagnosis of CIN level, the diagnosis of CIN3 in positive margin group were significantly more than negative margin group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion High HPV load of women of child-bearing age ( t〉 500), higher severity of TCT ( I〉 HSIL), diagnosis of high level CIN ( ~〉 CIN3) is the CIN margin risk factors of positive. Positive margin and tumor recurrence/continued. Before the operation, have experience on the part of patients at high risk for arrangement of the doctor, careful operation, combined with appropriate to expand the scope of operation planning situation, if all causes again conization is not possible, GIN3 patients with positive margin feasible uterus hysterectomy, patients for fertility preservation should be followed up closely.
出处 《中国医药科学》 2013年第12期7-9,共3页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
基金 广东省广州市海珠区科技和信息局医疗卫生指导性科技计划项目(2011-D-02)
关键词 育龄期 宫颈环形电切术 宫颈冷刀锥切术 切缘阳性 高危因素 Child-bearing age LEEP Cervical cold knife conization Positive margin Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献54

  • 1刘艳琼,陈亦乐.28例宫颈上皮内瘤样病变宫颈锥切术后再处理的临床分析[J].医学临床研究,2006,23(5):674-676. 被引量:9
  • 2赵文翠,藤绍然,祁秀娟,刘成娟,周淑华.宫腔镜子宫内膜电切术的应用进展[J].山东医药,2007,47(3):81-82. 被引量:7
  • 3戴志琴,潘凌亚,黄惠芳,郎景和.子宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ级患者的术后随诊及其影响因素[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(2):107-110. 被引量:23
  • 4李亚里,杨怡卓.人乳头瘤病毒亚型检测在宫颈病变分流管理中的意义[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(7):501-503. 被引量:55
  • 5Nuovo J.LEEP in the family practice setting[J].J Am Board Fam Pract,2003,16(4):360.
  • 6Wright TC,Cox JT,Massad LS,et al.2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithalial neoplasia[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003,189(1):295-304.
  • 7Sifiaree S,Srisomboon J,Kietpeerakcol C,et al.High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop electrosurgical excision:what should a clinician do?[J].J Asian Pac J Cancer Res,2006,7(3):463-466.
  • 8Chao A,Lin CT,Hsueh S,et al.Usefulness of human papillomavirus testing in the follow-up of patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2004,190(4):1046-1051.
  • 9Petorius GR,Peterson P,Azizi F,et al.Subsequent risk and presentation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 or cancer after a colposcopic diagnosis of CIN 1 or less[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2006,195(5):1260-1265.
  • 10Baytur YB,Ozbilgin K,Cilaker S,et al.A comparative study of the effect of raloxifene and gosorelin on uterine leiomyoma volume changes and estrogen receptor,progestemne receptor,bcl-2 and p53 expression immunohistochemically in premenopausal women[J].Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2007,135(1):94-103.

共引文献78

同被引文献71

  • 1谢辛,苟文丽,等.妇产科学[M].第8版,人民卫生出版社,2013:255-257.
  • 2Ahmedin Jemal.Global Cancer Statistics[J].Ca Cancer J Clin,2011:61.
  • 3Ouitrakul S,Udomthavomsuk B,Chumworathayi B,et al.Accuracy of colposcopically directed biopsy in diagnosis of cervical pathology at Srinagarind Hospital[J],Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2011,12(9):2451.
  • 4Singh Abaha,Arthur Bhavna,Agarwal Vivek.LEEP Verses Cryotherapy in CIN[J].The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India,2011,61(4):431.
  • 5Kyrgiou M,Koliopoulos G,Martin·Hirseh P,et al.Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions:systematic review and meta·analysis[J].Lancet,2006,367:489.
  • 6Himes KP,Simhan HN.Time from cervical conization to pregnancy and preterm birth[J].Obstet Gynecol,20O7,109:314.
  • 7Heather A,Frey MD.Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure J[J].Obstet Gynecol,2013,121(1):39.
  • 8徐波,李卫红,姚吉龙.LEEP治疗宫颈上皮内低度瘤样病变153例临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2008,23(15):2153-2154. 被引量:5
  • 9杨丽君,何淑英,龙燕芬.宫颈上皮内瘤变的筛查方法研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2009,24(9):1191-1193. 被引量:3
  • 10张为远,武明辉,张凇文,周保利,李长东,王建东,朱力,潘静.2007-2008年北京地区25~54岁已婚妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变的流行病学现状调查[J].中华妇产科杂志,2010,45(3):161-164. 被引量:27

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部