摘要
以1992-2010年SSCI收录的中国参与的国际合作论文为样本,运用文献计量学的方法,从数量分布、时间、学科等方面对中国主导论文(通讯作者是中国学者的合作论文)和中国从属论文(通讯作者不是中国学者的合作论文)的被引频次进行对比分析,发现中国主导论文同中国从属论文相比影响力较差,不仅高被引论文比重较低,总体平均被引频次较低,在大部分年份与学科中平均被引频次也处于劣势,不过在个别学科和年份仍处于优势,且整体仍具有上升潜力。
Based on the published papers from 1992-2010 with a Chinese address samples indexed by the SSCI, this paper, adopting a scientometrics approach, analyzed the citation counts of the papers with Chinese corresponding author and their distribution on discipline and time, in contract with the papers with non-Chinese corresponding author. The research indicates that the impact of the paper with Chinese corresponding author is integrally weaker than the paper with non-Chinese corresponding author, while stronger in some disciplines and years.
出处
《情报科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第7期91-95,共5页
Information Science
基金
吉林大学哲学社会科学研究种子基金项目(2010ZZ020)
