期刊文献+

骨性Ⅲ类错牙弓、基骨弓宽度及协调性分析 被引量:13

Dental arch, basal arch width and coordination analysis in skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)患者牙弓、基骨弓宽度及二者协调性,为临床诊断和治疗提供理论依据.方法 选择骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)患者33例为实验组,47例个别正常(牙合)为对照组,利用锥形束CT扫描颌面部,将扫描后图像导入Mimics10.01图像处理软件分别测量牙弓宽度、基骨弓宽度,并计算上下颌对应宽度之差,对测量结果进行独立样本t检验.结果 骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)组上颌牙弓宽度与个别正常(牙合)组比较无显著性差异,但下颌牙弓宽度大于正常(牙合),其中下颌第一磨牙处平均宽度正常(牙合)为(56.26±3.09)mm,骨型Ⅲ类患者为(57.78±3.22)mm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);骨性Ⅲ类错((牙合)上颌基骨弓宽度测量值均小于对照组,其中在上颌第二前磨牙处正常(骀)为(59.11±5.97)mm,骨型Ⅲ类患者为(56.23±5.28)mm,有统计学差异(P<0.05),下颌基骨弓宽度均大于对照组,其中在前磨牙及第一磨牙处分别为(47.44±2.96)mm、(59.81±3.87)mm和(76.20±4.20)mm,与正常(牙合)相比差异显著(P<0.05).骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)上下颌基骨弓宽度差值均小于正常(牙合)(P<0.01),而牙弓宽度差值仅在尖牙处差异显著(P<0.05),其余牙位测量项目无统计学差异.结论 ①骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)组上颌基骨宽度发育不足,下颌基骨宽度发育过度.②骨性Ⅲ类错(牙合)的宽度不协调表现在基骨水平,牙弓对基骨弓宽度不调有代偿. Objective To provide references for diagnosis andtreatment plan of skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion based on the study of dental arch widths, basal bone widths and their coordination. Methods Experimental groupconsists of 33 skeletal Class Ill malocclusion cases and control groupconsists of 47 individual normal occlusion cases. The data samples of thetwo groups were derived from Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans, and were used to measure dental arch widths and basalbone arch widths. The differences between the paired maxilla and mandible measurements were calculated. All the measurements and calculations were done in Mimics 10. 01. Independentsample t-testwas used to compare the two groups. Results Differences between the maxillary dental arch widths were unapparent; skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion had a tendency of larger mandibular dental arch widths. Maxillary basalbone archwidths of Class UI malocclusion groupwere narrower compared with normal occlusion samples. The second premolar segment was significantly narrower. Moreover, mandibular premolar and molarbasalbone arch widths of the skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion were significantly larger than the normal occlusion groups. Difference between maxillary and mandibular basal bone arch widths was larger in skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion. Difference between maxillary and mandibular dental arch widths in canine area was smaller while other dental segment width difference showed no statistical differences. Conelusions (1) In transverse dimension, maxillary basal bone arch grows insufficiently, while the mandibular basal bone archgrows excessively in skeletal class Ⅲ patients. (2) Widthdiscrepancy inskeletal class Ⅲ is at basal bonelevel. Dental arch showssome extent of compensation.
出处 《中华口腔正畸学杂志》 2013年第2期81-84,共4页 Chinese Journal of Orthodontics
关键词 骨性Ⅲ类错 牙弓宽度 基骨弓宽度 锥形束CT Skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion Dental arch width Basal bone arch width CBCT
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Guyer EC,Ellis EE 3rd,McNamara JA Jr,et al.Components of class m malocclusion in juveniles andadolescents. Angle Orthod,1986,56(1):7-30.
  • 2陈骊,赵丙姣.AngleⅢ类错畸形牙弓、基骨形态及牙量的测量分析[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2008,17(2):73-75. 被引量:3
  • 3UysalT,Usumez S,Memili B,et al. Dental and alveolararch widths in normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion.Angle Orthod,2005,75(5):809-813.
  • 4Slaj M,Spalj S,Pavlin D,et al. Dental archforms indentoalveolar Class I,II and IH. Angle Orthod,2010,80(5):919-924.
  • 5Kim J T,Lee J W. Three dimensional structural analysisbetween dental arch and basal bone in normal occlusion*Korean J Orthod,2011,41(4):224-236.
  • 6杨磊,刘勇,王瑞,赵和平,高巍然.锥束CT数字化模型与石膏模型在牙颌测量中的对比研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2012,28(1):90-93. 被引量:13
  • 7Baumgaertel S,Palomo JM,Palomo L,et al. Reliability andaccuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dentalmeasurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009,136(1):19-25;discussion 25-8.
  • 8Park H C,Lee J W. Study of horizontal skeletal pattern anddental arch in skeletal Class ID malocclusion patients. KoreanJ Orthod,2008,38(5):358-370.
  • 9Bishara SE,Jakobsen JR,Treder J,et al. Arch lengthchanges from 6 weeks to 45 years. Angle Orthod. 1998 Feb;68(1):69-74.
  • 10Braun S,Hnat WP,Fender DE,et al. The form of thehuman dental arch. Angle Orthod,1998,68(1):29-36.

二级参考文献33

  • 1米红,赵碧蓉,张跃东.成都市正常合的青少年Howes值测量分析[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1995,13(2):102-105. 被引量:6
  • 2柯杰,李忠科,林珠,赵桂芝.牙颌模型激光三维测量分析系统(一)──系统组成与功能[J].实用口腔医学杂志,1995,11(3):200-202. 被引量:8
  • 3王萍,李晓智,张福军,周建.重庆市正常青少年牙颌模型测量研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(6):639-641. 被引量:7
  • 4谭家莉,段银钟,匡威,徐琳,宁芳,王蕾.AngleⅢ类错牙弓及牙槽弓宽度测量分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2006,22(12):739-742. 被引量:2
  • 5Berghagen N.Photogrammetric principles applied to intraoralradiodontia:A method for diagnosis and therapy in odontolo-gy[M].Stockholm,Sweden:Springer,1951:12-18.
  • 6Kau CH,Richmond S,Incrapera A,et al.Three dimen-sional surface acquisition systems for the study of facial mor-phology and their application to maxillofacial surgery[J].IntJ Med Robot,2007,3(2):97-110.
  • 7Silva MA,Wolf U,Heinicke F,et al.Cone-beam compu-ted tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning:Aradiation dose evaluation[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or-thop,2008,133(5):640 e1-e5.
  • 8Berco M,Rigali PH Jr,Miner RM,et al.Accuracy and re-liability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009,136(1):17 e1-e9.
  • 9Leifert M,Leifert M,Efstratiadis S,et al.Comparison ofspace analysis evaluations with digital models and plasterdental casts[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2009,136(1):16 e1-e4.
  • 10Zilberman O,Huggare JA,Parikakis KA.Evaluation of thevalidity of tooth size and arch width measurements using con-ventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models[J].Angle Orthod,2003,73(3):301-306.

共引文献14

同被引文献108

引证文献13

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部