摘要
目的:对词汇的概念义和情绪义加工的时间进程进行直接的对比研究。方法:以50名健康大学生为被试,采用一种特殊的词汇——双意义情绪词,通过设置不同的SOA条件(50毫秒和300毫秒),同时考察了词汇的语义启动和情绪启动效应,要求被试进行词汇判断任务。结果:在短SOA(50毫秒)条件下,词汇的语义启动效应和情绪启动效应均显著,且两者之间无显著差异;在长SOA(300毫秒)条件下,词汇的语义启动效应显著,但未发现情绪启动效应。结论:词汇概念义的加工同时包括了自动化和控制性的加工过程,而情绪义的加工只包含了自动化的加工过程,表明词汇的概念义和情绪义加工具有不同的时间进程。
Objective: To directly compare the time course of the conceptual semantic and affective semantic process- ing of words using the comparative approach. Methods: Fifty healthy college students participated in the experiment. A special type of words, named dual-meaning words, which had both conceptual meaning and affective meaning, were used, We adopted simultaneously the semantic priming and affective priming paradigm with a short (50 ms) and long (300 ms) SOA (stimulus onset asynchrony). The subjects were asked to perform a lexical decision task. Results: At the short SOA condition, there were both significant semantic and significant affeetive priming effects. But at the long SOA condition, on- ly significant semantic priming effect was found. Conclusion: These findings suggest that conceptual semantic processing of words contains both automatic and controlled processes, but affeetive semantic processing is more an automatic one, in- dicating different time courses of the conceptual and affective semantic processing of words.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第3期349-352,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
国家自然科学基金(31200846
31271195)
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC190022)
浙江理工大学科研启动基金(1113822-Y)
关键词
概念义
情绪义
双意义词
时间进程
启动效应
Conceptual semantic
Affective semantic
Dual-meaning words
Time course
Priming effect