期刊文献+

中文版人际长处量表的模型验证及信效度检验

Circumplex and Psychometric Analysis of Chinese Version of Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:将人际长处量表(Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths,IIS)引入中国,并在大学生群体中对其理论结构和信效度进行检验。方法:1115名在校大学生完成中文版人际长处量表(C-IIS)、部分被试完成大五人格量表(NEO-FFI)和生活满意度量表(SWLS)。结果:①探索性因子分析和环形结构分析证明C-IIS符合环形顺序假设并可拟合准环形模型;②8种人际长处类型与神经质人格显著负相关,与外向性和严谨性人格显著正相关,与生活满意度显著正相关;③总量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.96,8个分量表Cronbach’sα系数在0.70-0.90之间。结论:C-IIS符合人际环形模型并具有较好的信效度,可作为国内测量人际长处的有效工具。 Objective: To analyze the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths (C-IIS) for Chinese undergraduates and explore the circumplex structure. Methods: A total of 1115 Chinese un- dergraduate students completed the Chinese version of the IIS(C-IIS), in addition to NEO Five-Factor Inventory(NEO-FFI) and Satisfaction with Life Scale(SWLS). Results: (1)Result of exploratory and circumplex analysis supported the hypothesis of circumplex structure and that C-IIS had acceptable fit of circumplex model; (2)Through validity analysis, 8 kinds of in- terpersonal strengths showed significant negative correlation with neuroticism, and positive correlation with extraversion, conscientiousness, openness, agreeableness and life satisfaction; (3)Reliability analysis supported excellent internal consis- tency reliability of the C-IIS, the subscales' internal consistency reliability were between 0.70 and 0.90, and the coeffi- cient alpha of total scale was 0.96. Conclusion: The C-IIS has good reliability, validity as well as circumplex structure; it can be applied to interpersonal research areas.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期398-401,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 人际长处量表 环形结构 信度 效度 Inventory of interpersonal strengths Circumplex Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Taylor SE, Klein LC, Lewis BP, et al. Biobehavioral respon- ses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or- flight. Psychological Review, 2000, 107(3): 411-429.
  • 2Leary T. Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York, NY: Ronald Press, 1957.
  • 3Alden LE, Wiggins JS, Pincus AL. Construction of circum- plex scale for the inventory of interpersonal problem. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1990, 55 (1): 521-536.
  • 4Hofsess CD, Tracey TJG. The interpersonal circumplex as a model of interpersonal capabilities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2005, 84(2): 137-147.
  • 5Hatcher RL, Rogers DT. Development and validation of ameasure of interpersonal strengths: The inventory of inter- personal strengths. Psychological Assessment, 2009, 21(4): 554-569.
  • 6Pincus AL, Gurtman MB. Interpersonal theory and the inter- personal circumplex: Evolving perspectives on normal and abnormal personality. In Strack S. Differentiating normal and abnormal personality. New York, NY: Springer, 2006. 83-111.
  • 7Brdar I, Kashdan TB. Character strengths and well-being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and corre- lates. Journal of Research in Personality, 2010, 44(1): 151- 154.
  • 8Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
  • 9姚若松,梁乐瑶.大五人格量表简化版(NEO-FFI)在大学生人群的应用分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2010,18(4):457-459. 被引量:175
  • 10Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfac- tion with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49(l): 71-75.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Costa PT, MeCrae RR. The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources,1985.
  • 2Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual suppiement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 3Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO-PI-R professional manual. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
  • 4Holden RR, Fekken GC. The NEO five factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 1994, 17:441-444.
  • 5Egan V, Deary I, Austin E. The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and Care more rehable than O and E. Personality and Individual Differences, 2000, 29:907-920.
  • 6Schmitz N, Hartkamp N, Baldini C, Rollnik J, Tress W. Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO- FFI in psychosomatic outpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 31:713-722.
  • 7Hrebickova M, Urbanek T, Cermak I, Szarota P, Fickova E, et al. The NEO five-factor inventory in Czech, Polish, and Slovak contexts. In McCrae RR Allik R. The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002:53-78.
  • 8McCrae RR, Costa PT. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 2004, 36:587-596.
  • 9Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 10Parker WD, Stumpf H. A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments. Personality and Individual Differences, 1998, 25:1005-1025.

共引文献174

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部