期刊文献+

学前一年教育效能的增值评价研究 被引量:15

Value Added Analysis of Teaching Effectiveness of One-Year Preschool Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过多阶段随机抽样搜集整理有关数据,采用多层回归与非连续性回归相整合的数据分析与处理方式,以班级为评价单位,分别从幼儿数学学习和语言发展上考察学前一年教育效能,以及学前一年班级教育环境质量与其效能的关系。结果发现,在幼儿数学学习和语言发展上学前一年教育效能显著,达到0.6~0.3个标准差,并从中心区向边远区依次递减;学前一年班级教育环境质量对其教育效能具有正向预测效应,并从中心区向边远区依次递增。同样质量的学前一年教育改进,边远区学前一年教育效能增量最多,边远区儿童从学前一年教育质量改善中也受益最大。无论在政策制定还是在资源配置上,都应该向边远区适当倾斜,才能从总体上促进我国学前一年教育的均衡发展。 The research, with class as assessment unit, examined the teaching effectiveness of one-year preschool education in the aspects of children's mathematics learning and language development, and the relationship between the quality of one-year preschool education environment and its teaching effective- ness. Collecting data by multi-stage random sampling, and analyzing the data by the consolidation model of multi-level regression and discontinuous regression, the research found that the teaching effectiveness of one-year preschool education in children's mathematics learning and language development was significant, up to about 0.6--0.3 standard deviations, and the variations gradually decreased from the central area to the remote area. The quality of one-year preschool education environment had positive effects on its teach- ing effectiveness, and the variations gradually increased from the central area to the remote area. A one- year preschool education improvement efforts of the same quality could lead to a greater increase in the teaching effectiveness and better benefit children in the remote area. Therefore, the education policy mak- ing and resource allocation should somewhat prioritize the remote areas to promote the balanced developmerit of one-year preschool education in China as a whole.
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期56-66,共11页 Journal of Educational Studies
基金 2009年国家社会科学基金教育学重点课题"学前一年教育纳入义务教育的条件保障研究"(课题批准号:AHA090006 项目合同号:QGB090006)的研究成果
关键词 学前一年 教育效能 增值评价 one-year preschool teaching effectiveness value added analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1W. S. Barnet. Early Childhood Education , in School Reform Proposal :The Research Evidence[M]. Greenwich,Conn.:Iformation Age Publishing,2002. 1-26.
  • 2Cook, T. D.,& Campbell, D. T. Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings[M]. Boston:Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
  • 3William T. Gormley Jr. , Ted Gayer, Deborah Phillips, & Brittany Dawson,The Effects of Universal Pre-K on CognitiveDevelopment[J]. Developmental Psychology ,2005(6) ,872-884.
  • 4刘焱,潘月娟.《幼儿园教育环境质量评价量表》的特点、结构和信效度检验[J].学前教育研究,2008(6):60-64. 被引量:49

二级参考文献8

  • 1刘焱.试论托幼机构教育质量评价的几个问题[J].学前教育研究,1998(3):14-17. 被引量:50
  • 2刘丽湘.当前我国幼儿园教育质量评价工作的误区及调整策略[J].学前教育研究,2006(7):85-87. 被引量:50
  • 3Frede, E.. The role of program quality in producing early childhood program benefits. The Future of Children, 1995,5 (3) : 115-132
  • 4Schweinhart, L.R., Barnes, H.V. and Weikart, D.P.. Significant benefits: the High/Scope Perry preschool study through age 27. Monographs of the High/School Education ResearCh Foundation, Ypsilianti, MI: High/Scope Press, 1993, (10)
  • 5Harms, T., Clifford, M., & Cryer, D.. Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. Revised Edition (ECERS-R). Vermont: Teachers College Press, 1998
  • 6Sylva, K., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B.. Assessing quality in the early years: Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Extension(ECERS-E): Four curricular subscales. Stoke-on Trent: Trentham Books, 2003
  • 7Pence, A., and Moss, P.. Towards an inclusionary approach in defining quality. In: Moss, P., and Pence A. (eds.). Valuing quality in early childhood services: New approaches to defining quality. Teachers College Press, New York, 1994:172-179
  • 8Bredekamp, S.. Regulating child care quality: Evidence from NAEYC's accreditation system. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children, 1989:12

共引文献48

同被引文献180

引证文献15

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部