LEEP刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床对比分析

Clinical Comparison and Analysis of LEEP Bistoury and Microwave on Chronic Cervicitis

目的探讨LEEP刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床价值及优越性。方法将156例慢性宫颈炎患者分为LEEP组82例与微波组74例,分别给予LEEP刀及微波烧灼治疗,观察两组临床疗效。结果 LEEP组手术时间、术中出血量及术后阴道排液时间均低于微波组(P<0.05);两组患者术后出血发生率比较无显著差异(P>0.05);LEEP刀与微波治疗中轻度宫颈糜烂患者治愈率比较无显著差异(P>0.05);LEEP组治疗重度宫颈糜烂治愈率明显高于微波治疗组(P<0.05)。结论 LEEP刀与微波治疗中轻度宫颈糜烂均具有较好的治疗效果,LEEP刀治疗重度宫颈糜烂疗效优于微波治疗。

Objective To investigate the clinical values and superiority ofLEEP bistoury and microwave on the treatment of chronic cervicitis. Methods 156 cases with chronic cervicitis are divided into the LEEP group （82 cases） and the microwave group （74 cases）. Both groups are treated with LEEP bistoury and microwave cautery. Observations are carried out about the clinical efficacy of both groups. Results The operation time, bleeding amount in surgery and the time post-operative vaginal discharge of the LEEP group were all lower than those of the microwave group （P〈0.05）. There was no significant difference in the incurrence rate of post-operative bleeding in both groups （P〉0.05）. And there was no significant difference in the cure rate of mild cervical erosion in both groups （P〈0.05）. The cure rate of the LEEP group on severe cervical erosion was significantly higher than that of the microwave group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion LEEP bistoury and microwave both have good clinical efficacy on the treatment of mild cervical erosion, while LEEP bistoury is better than microwave on the treatment of severe cervical erosion.