期刊文献+

低浓度罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼腰硬联合阻滞用于分娩镇痛的临床效果观察 被引量:21

Effect analysis on low concentration of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil combined spinal epidural analgesia in childbirth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察低浓度罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼腰硬联合阻滞(CSEA)用于分娩镇痛的临床效果,探讨其可行性、对母婴的影响及不良反应。方法选择足月单胎妊娠初产妇60例,随机分为观察组和对照组各30例。观察组宫口开大至3cm时行L3-4腰椎穿刺术,蛛网膜下腔注入舒芬太尼5μg,硬膜外腔向头侧置管3.5cm,硬膜外腔接病人自控镇痛泵(PCEA)。硬膜外腔用药:0.1%盐酸罗哌卡因+0.2μg/ml舒芬太尼混合液,总量100ml。对照组按常规处理未用任何镇痛药。观察镇痛后5、10、30、60和90min VAS评分、各产程时间、新生儿Apgar评分、分娩方式、镇痛效果满意度及不良反应。结果观察组用药后各时点VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.01);两组各产程、产后出血差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组正常分娩率低于对照组(P<0.01),缩宫素使用率高于对照组(P<0.05),但两组机械助产率和剖宫产率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组新生儿Apgar评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组镇痛效果满意度优于对照组(P<0.01);观察组出现皮肤瘙痒2例,两组均出现恶心1例,下肢麻木感1例。结论低浓度罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼腰硬联合阻滞用于分娩镇痛,镇痛效果确切,具有起效快、镇痛强、持续时间长等优点,虽然会增加缩宫素使用率,但并不增加剖宫产率,对母婴无不良影响。 Objective To observe the effect of low concentration of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil combined spinal epidural anesthesia(CSEA) for labor analgesia, and discuss its feasibility, effects on mothers and adverse reaction. Methods Sixty pregnant women were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 30 cases in each group. In the observation group, when uterine neck opened about 3 cm, the L3-4 lumbar puncture was pertormed, and 5 μg sufentanil was injected into subarachnoid, the tube was placed cephalad into epi- dural cavity until 3.5 cm depth, epidural cavity was connected with a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. CSEA was performed using a mixture of 0. 1% hydrochloric acid ropivacaine with 0.2 μg/ml of sufentanil adminis- tered in epidural cavity, in total 100 ml. The control group received routine treatment and did not use any analgesics. At 5, 10, 30, 60 and 90 min after analgesia VAS score, the duration of labor, mode of delivery, neonatal Apgar score, analgesic effect degree of satisfaction and adverse reaction were observed. Results VAS score between two groups had statistically significant difference. VAS score in observation group was lower than that in control group. Between two groups, the difference in the birth process, and postpartum hemorrhage were not statistically signifi- cance. Normal birth rate in the observation group was lower than that in control group(P 〈0. 01 ), the rate of using oxytocin in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P 〈 0. 05). The difference in mechanical delivery rate and cesarean section rate, neonatal Apgar score had not statistically significance between the two groups. Analgesia effect degree of satisfaction in observation group was better than that in the control group. Two cases withitch of skin were found in observation group, 1 case with nausea and 1 cases with lower limb numbness in each group. Conclusion Low concentration of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil combined spinal epidural analgesia in child- birth had obvious effect and a long time of analygesia and its effect was quick. Although it will increase the rate of u- sing oxytocin, but not affect the rate of cesarean section, with no harmful effects on mother and infant.
出处 《中国临床新医学》 2013年第6期547-550,共4页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
关键词 罗哌卡因 舒芬太尼 腰硬联合阻滞 分娩镇痛 Ropivacaine Sufentanil Sufentanil combined spinal epidural anesthesia(CSEA) Laboranalgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1刘继云,佘守章,邬子林,许立新.轻比重罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因用于高龄患者连续脊麻的可行性研究[J].广东医学,2006,27(11):1608-1610. 被引量:6
  • 2胡祖荣,曹培如,佘守章,邓显仔,黄希照,苏丹晨,刘继云.鞘内不同剂量舒芬太尼在腰硬联合阻滞分娩镇痛中的作用比较[J].广东医学,2006,27(11):1629-1631. 被引量:8
  • 3Ahonen J, Olkkola KT, Hynynen M, et al. Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2000,85 : 533-540.
  • 4Thomson LR, Harding G, Hudson RJ. A comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgey[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2000,14: 652-656.
  • 5Kanai Y,Katsuki H,Takasaki,et al. Comparison of the anesthetic potency and intraceltular concentrations of S(-)and R (-)bupivacaine and ropivacaine crafish gaint axon in vitro[J]. Anesh Analg, 2000,90 : 415-420.
  • 6Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, et al. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacine[J]. Anesh Analg, 1989,69:563- 569.
  • 7HOLST D,MLLMANN M.Intrathecal local anesthetic distribution with the new spinocath catheter[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,1998,23(5):463-468.
  • 8MINVILLE V,FOURCADE O,GROUSSET D,et al.Spinal anesthesia using single injection small dose bupivacaine versus continuous catheter injection techniques for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients[J].Anesth Analg,2006,102(5):1559-1563.
  • 9CAMANN W.Pain relief during labor[J].N Engl Med,2005,352(7):718-720.
  • 10MURALIDHAR V.Over-the-needle versus microcatheter-through-needle technique for continuous spinal anesthesia:a preliminary study[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,1999,24(5):417-421.

共引文献19

同被引文献165

引证文献21

二级引证文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部