期刊文献+

碳权交易价格对闭环供应链定价的影响 被引量:5

Effects of Carbon Trading Price on Closed-loop Supply Chain Pricing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 碳权交易市场是控制企业碳排放的有效平台,将其考虑到闭环供应链中可以更好的减少供应链的环境污染。论文在碳权交易市场管理者是理性的基础上,运用博弈论研究了碳权交易价格对闭环供应链中定价的影响。研究表明,提高碳权交易价格有利于废旧品回收,但会降低产品销售量。另外,供应链参与者的收益不仅受碳权交易价格影响,还与供应链的碳排放量和政府给予的碳权指标相关。与不受碳排放影响闭环供应链不同,当分散策略下碳权交易价格大于集中策略下碳权交易价格时,受碳排放影响的闭环供应链集中策略可能劣于分散策略。 Carbon trading market is an effective platform for control corporate carbon emissions, considering it into closed-loop supply chain can better reduce environmental pollution in supply chain. Based on a rational manager of carbon trading market, this paper studied the impact of carbon trading price on closed-loop supply chain pricing using game theory. We have shown that, the increase of carbon trading price conducive to recycle waste products but reduce product sales. In addition, the profit of supply chain participants are not only impacted by carbon trading price, but also related with the supply chain carbon emissions and government's carbon rights indicator. Finally, decentralized strategy may be superior to centralized strategy when the carbon trading price in former is higher than latter's, this is different from a closed-loop supply chain which is unrelated with carbon emission.
出处 《燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2013年第2期103-108,共6页 Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70171134) 河北省科技计划项目(11457202D-30) 河北省科学技术研究与发展计划软科学研究项目(11457295) 秦皇岛市科学技术研究与发展计划(201101 A097)资助
关键词 碳权交易 闭环供应链 STACKELBERG博弈 定价 closed-loop supply chain carbon trading price stackelberg game pricing
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献101

共引文献304

同被引文献56

  • 1夏良杰,孔清逸,李友东,徐春秋.考虑交叉持股的低碳供应链减排与定价决策研究[J].中国管理科学,2021,29(4):70-81. 被引量:34
  • 2余淑均.对绿色技术内涵与类别的再思考[J].武汉工程大学学报,2007,29(5):40-42. 被引量:12
  • 3李寿德,黄采金,顾孟迪,张东红.基于排污权交易的厂商污染治理新技术投资决策的期权博弈模型[J].系统管理学报,2007,16(6):701-705. 被引量:11
  • 4IPCC. Climate change 2007 : The third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 2007:45-50.
  • 5Rehdanz K, Tol R S J. Unilateral regulation of bilateral trade in greenhouse gas emission permits[J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(4) : 397-416.
  • 6Bernard A, Haurie A, Vielle M, et al. A two-level dy- namic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries [J]. Journal o f Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 32 (6) :1830-1856.
  • 7Dobos I. The effects of emission trading on production and inventories in the Arrow-Karlin model[J].Interna- tional Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 93-94 (8) :301-308.
  • 8Hong Zhaofu, Chu Chengbin, Yu Yugang. Optimization of production planning for green manufacturing [C]// Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Beijing, China, Aprilll - 14, 2012.
  • 9Hua Guowei, Han Qiao, Li Jian. Optimal order lot siz- ing and pricing with carbon trade[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2011.
  • 10Brawn E, Wield D. Regulation as a means for the social control of technology[J]. Technology Analysis ~ Stra- tegic Management, 1994, 6 (3) : 259- 273.

引证文献5

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部