摘要
在《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》第三条中,马克思基于新的实践唯物主义立场,剖析了18世纪法国唯物主义哲学历史观的两大理论缺陷,揭示了实践是环境、教育及人自身形成与改变的共同根基。恩格斯所做的四处修改,没有改变马克思的原则立场和根本观点,但的确存在内容表述的不同和一定程度的思想差异,效果有利有弊。回归马克思稿本,有利于展现第三条的思想原韵。
As far as the third argument of Theses on Feuerbach, Marx who adopted a new practical materialist standpoint stated two major theoretical defects in the 18thcentury French materialist philo-sophical conception of history and pointed out that practice was the common foundation for environ-ment, and education that had an influence on human beings. Although not making any way change in the principles and basic viewpoints held by Marx, Engels applied a different expressive way and repre-sent a somewhat different thinking to his four revisions, which had advantages and disadvantages but still kept the original thread of thought of the third argument.
出处
《海军工程大学学报(综合版)》
2013年第2期89-92,共4页
Journal of Naval University of Engineering(Comprehensive Edition)