期刊文献+

弥烟技术防治苹果病虫害效果试验

Test of Fumigation Method on Prevention and Control of Apple Diseases and Pests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过田间试验,比较了烟雾机弥烟施药技术和常规喷雾法防治苹果病虫害的效果。结果表明:弥烟区苹果白粉病第7、14 d的防效为92.28%、96.18%,比常规区防效提高6.32、7.78个百分点;弥烟区苹果小卷叶蛾药后5、10、15 d防效均为100%,比常规区防效提高8.3、25.0、29.4个百分点;弥烟区苹果红蜘蛛药后1、3、7、14 d的防效为72.50%、90.23%、96.39%、97.49%,比常规区提高23.20、15.15、6.20、5.98个百分点。烟雾机弥烟施药技术对苹果病虫害的防治效果明显优于常规喷雾法,省工、省力、节约成本。 The control effects on apple diseases and pests of the method of fumigation pesticide formed by the smoke machine were compared to that of the method of conventional spray. The control effect of the fumi- gation method on powdery mildew was 92. 28% and 96. 18% respectively on the 7th and 14th day, which in- creased by 6. 32 and 7. 78 percent points respectively compared to the conventional spray method; the control effect on Olethreutidae was 100% on the 5th, 10th and 15th day, which increased by 8.3, 25.0 and 29.4 percent points respectively; the control effect on red spider was 72. 50%, 90. 23%, 96. 39% and 97.49% respectively on the 1st, 3rd, 7th and 14th days, which increased by 23.20, 15.15,6.20 and 5.98 percent points respectively. The fumigation method had obvious better control effects on apple diseases and pests than that of conventional spray method, and could save labour and cost.
出处 《山东农业科学》 2013年第6期89-91,共3页 Shandong Agricultural Sciences
基金 烟台市科技局项目"生产绿色A级苹果病虫害防治技术效果研究"(烟科成鉴字[2010]第153号)
关键词 烟雾机 弥烟技术 苹果病虫害 防效 Smoke machine Fumigation method Apple diseases and pests Control effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1王开运,姜兴印,仪美芹.山东省主要棉花害虫的发生现状与综合防治[J].农药,1997,36(2):6-9. 被引量:9
  • 2Weiner K L, Parkin C S. The use of computational fluid dynamic code for modeling spray from a mistblower[ J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1993, 55 (4) : 313 -324.
  • 3Sidahmed M M, Brown R B. Simulation of spray dispersal and deposition from a forestry airblast sprayer-part II : droplet trajectory model[ J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 2001,44( 1 ) :5 - 17.
  • 4Tsay J, Fox R D, Ozkan H E, et al. Evaluation of a pneumatic-shield spraying system by CFD simulation[ J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 2002, 45(1) : 47 -54.
  • 5Delelea M A, Moor A De, Sonek B, et al. Modelling and validation of the air flow generated by a cross flow airsprayer as affected by travel speed and fan speed [ J ]. B iosystems E ngineerlng,2005,92 (2) :165 -174.
  • 6Delelea M A, Jaekenb P, Debaer C, et al. CFD prototyping of an air-assisted orchard sprayer aimed at drift reduction[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture ,2007,55 ( 1 ) : 16 - 27.
  • 7Baetens K, Nuyttens D, Verboven P, et al. Predicting drift from field spraying by means of 3D computational fluid dynamics model [ J ]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2007,56 ( 2 ) : 161 - 173.
  • 8Fluent Inc. Fluent version 4.3 user' s manual, computational fluid dynamics software[ M ]. Lebanon, N. H. : Fluent Inc. , 1995.
  • 9SALEH J M.流体流动手册[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2004.
  • 10赵志敏.棉花病虫综合防治技术推广应用及其效益[J].安徽农业科学,1986,2(28):59-65.

共引文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部