期刊文献+

基于IFS交通状态决策信息一致性融合 被引量:2

Consistent Fusion of Traffic State Decision Information Based on IFS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对多源交通信息具有模糊性和时变性的特点,引入直觉模糊集理论(IFS),建立多源交通信息一致性融合算法,融合传感器检测信息与人工信息对交通状态进行实时判别.为了解决IFS中非隶属度函数难以确定的问题,借鉴隶属度函数的构造方法,通过建立双隶属度函数构造直觉模糊数.并以直觉模糊数中的隶属度、非隶属度建立支持度函数,量化决策信息的一致性程度,决策信息的支持度越高集成权重越大,并且权值随决策信息的变化而动态更新.最后给出交通状态决策信息融合算法的具体步骤,并通过算例证明算法是有效的. Considering the multi-source traffic information with fuzziness and time-varying characteristics,this paper introduces the intuitionistic fuzzy set theory(IFS) to establish consistency fusion algorithm of multi-source traffic information.It integrates sensor detection information and artificial information to recognize on real-time traffic status.To solve the problem,it is difficult to determine in the non-membership function of the IFS.The construction method of the membership function is introduced,and the dual membership function is used to construct the intuitionistic fuzzy numbers.The support degree function is established using the membership degree and the non-membership degree,to quantify the degree of consistency in decision-making information.The higher the support degree of decision-making information is,the greater is the weight degree of integration.The weight is dynamically updated with the changes in the decision-making information.Finally,the steps is given for the traffic state decision-making information fusion algorithm,and an example is used to illustrate the effectiveness of the algorithm.
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期71-77,共7页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
关键词 智能交通 状态识别 信息融合 直觉模糊集 intelligent transportation traffic state decision information fusion intuitionistic fuzzy set(IFS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献75

共引文献123

同被引文献26

  • 1王洪德,潘科,姜福东.基于AHP的影响城市地铁运营安全的危害分析及预防对策[J].铁道学报,2007,29(2):27-31. 被引量:40
  • 2公安部交通管理局和建设部城市建设司.城市道路交通管理评价指标体系[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2007.
  • 3BEN-AKIVA M, BOCCARA B.Integrated framework for travel behavior analysis[C]// 4th Conference of International Association of Travel Behavior Research.Aix-en-Provence:[s.n.], 1987:89-109.
  • 4HUSSEIN D.An agent-based approach to modelling driver route choice behaviour under the influence of real-time information[J].Transportation Research Part C, 2002, 10(5):331-349.
  • 5ROBIN L, TERRY D, EYRAN G, et al.Pre-trip information and route-choice decisions with stochastic travel conditions:Theory[J].Transportation Research Part B, 2014, 67(2):187-207.
  • 6ABOLGHASEM S N, KYEHYUN K.Ontology based personalized route planning system using a multi-criteria decision making approach[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(2):2250-2259.
  • 7SUN Zhongwei, THEO A, HARRY T.A heterogeneous latent class model of activity rescheduling, route choice and information acquisition decisions under multiple uncertain events[J].Transportation Research Part C, 2012, 25(3):46-60.
  • 8ANDREW L B, MATTHEW R, ROMOSER E, et al.Towards a social psychology-based microscopic model of driver behavior and decision-making:modifying Lewin's field theory[J].Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 32(3):816-821.
  • 9XU Hongli, ZHOU Jing, XU Wei.A decision-making rule for modeling travelers' route choice behavior based on cumulative prospect theory[J].Transportation Research Part C, 2011, 19(2):218-228.
  • 10ESPINILLAA M, DE ANDRéS B R, MARTíNEZ F J A, et al.A 360-degree performance appraisal model dealing with heterogeneous information and dependent criteria[J].Information Sciences, 2013, 222:459-471.

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部