期刊文献+

大型公共建筑可持续性评价指标体系及指标权重研究 被引量:4

Study on Assessment Indicator and Assessment Indicator Weight of Sustainability Assessment System of Large Public Building
下载PDF
导出
摘要 可持续建筑是建筑未来发展的必然趋势.针对我国大型公共建筑的特点,通过对国内外建筑可持续性评价体系的研究,建立了针对我国国情的大型公共建筑可持续性评价指标体系,提出了基于统筹熵权法的评价指标权重确定方法,对大型公共建筑的可持续性评价进行了积极探索.为建立科学合理的大型公共建筑可持续性评价指标体系和大型公共建筑的可持续性评价提供了参考依据. Sustainable buildings will be an inevitable trend of buildings in the tuture. In the light ot the characteristics of large public buildings in China, through the research about domestic and international building sustainability assessment system,the indicator system of sustainability assessment of large public buildings is established according to China's home conditions. The method determining the weights of assessment indicators based on the comprehensive entropy weight method was put forward. It has been actively explored. In this study,a theoretical foundation is laid for establishing a scientific and rational indicator system of sustainability assessment.
出处 《甘肃科学学报》 2013年第2期123-127,共5页 Journal of Gansu Sciences
基金 陕西省自然科学基础研究基金(2011JY016) 陕西省教育厅专项科研项目(11JK1041)
关键词 大型公共建筑 可持续性 统筹熵权法 权重 large public building sustainability comprehensive entropy weight method weight
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1陈莉.江青松,赵凤.绿色建筑评估与安徽建筑业科技创新[M].合肥;合肥工业大学出版社,2008.
  • 2杨茜,章易.我国发展绿色建筑任重道远[J].中国住宅设施,2006(2):27-29. 被引量:6
  • 3Brundtland. Our Common Future:The World Commission on Environment and Development[M]. New York: Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1987.
  • 4清华大学建筑技术科学系.海外各国绿色建筑评估系统对比报告[R].2008.
  • 5朱洪祥.德国DGNB可持续建筑评估认证体系[J].建设科技,2010(18):78-79. 被引量:13
  • 6中华人民共和国建设部,中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫局.GB/T50378-2006.绿色建筑评价标准[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006.
  • 7党博.大型公共建筑可持续性评价模型研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2012.
  • 8王长庆,龙惟定,杜鹏飞,等译.美国绿色建筑协会.美国绿色建筑技术手册[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1999.
  • 9严静,龙惟定.关于绿色建筑评估体系中权重系统的研究[J].建筑科学,2009,25(2):16-19. 被引量:18
  • 10Lee W L,Chau C K,Yik F W H,et al. On the Study of the Credit Weighting Scale in a Building Environmental Assess- ment Scheme [J]. Building and Environmental, 2002, 37: 1 385-1 396.

二级参考文献17

  • 1李清明,李荣强,李清明,李荣强.多因素复杂系统最佳因素权重确定的一种新思路——以深港西部通道工程深圳湾公路大桥为例[J].水文地质工程地质,2003,30(S1):55-61. 被引量:2
  • 2李继军,潘亚.群体决策和AHP法结合确定指标权重[J].基建优化,2006,27(6):27-29. 被引量:19
  • 3BREEAM[ EB/OL]. http ://www. breeam. org. 2008.
  • 4BREEAM fact file. Version5 [ EB/OL ]. http ://breeam. org/filelibrary/ Breeam_ Fact_ File _ Version_ 5 _ Oct_ 2007. pdf. 2007.
  • 5Cole RJ. Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles [ J ]. Building Research & Information, 2005,35 (5) :455 - 467.
  • 6Cole RJ. Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions [ J ]. Building Research & Information, 1999,27 : 230 - 246.
  • 7Appu Haapio, Pertti Viitaniemi. A critical review of building environmental assessment tools[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2008,28 (7) : 469 - 482.
  • 8LEED[ EB/OL]. http ://www. usgbc. org. 2008.
  • 9LEED Steering Committee, USGBC. LEED-NC (Version 2. 2 ) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Green Building Rating System for New Construction & Major Renovation[S].
  • 10日本可持续建筑协会.Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency (CASBEE) [ M ]. 2003.

共引文献555

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部