摘要
目的:观察温针透刺配合运动八法治疗肩关节周围炎的临床疗效。方法:将250例患者随机分成治疗组148例,采用温针透刺配合运动八法治疗;对照组102例采用电针治疗,两组均每天治疗1次,10 d为1疗程,3个疗程结束后进行疗效比较。结果:治疗组总有效率为92.57%,对照组为79.41%,两组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:温针配合运动疗法治疗肩关节周围炎效果更好。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of the temperature needle with sport eight methods in the treatment of the shoulder periarthritis. Method: Two hundred and fifty cases were divided into a treatment group with 148 patients at the random who were treated with temperature needle with sport eight methods and a control group of 102 cases with electric acupuncture. Both groups were treated once a day and 10 days a course. After three courses of treatment, their treatment efficacies were compared. Result: The total efficacy of the treatment group was 92.57% and that of the control group 79.41%. The difference of the total efficacy rates of two groups had statistical significance( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion: The temperature needle with sport eight methods treating shoulder periarthritis has better efficacy.
出处
《上海医药》
CAS
2013年第12期30-32,共3页
Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词
肩关节周围炎
温针
运动八法
电针
shoulder joint activity obstacles
temperature needle
sports eight methods
acusector