期刊文献+

哈尔滨建成区土壤养分变异及相关分析 被引量:1

Analysis of variablity of soil nutrients and correlation on built-up area of Harbin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析哈尔滨建成区土壤有机质和pH变异性与各养分值间相关性,利用GIS软件绘制样点分布图,采用SPSS12软件包进行描述性分析和相关分析。结果表明哈尔滨建成区整体土壤表现为弱碱性,从利用方式上表现出由草地一林地一路边pH呈上升趋势。建成区pH变异均小于10%,表现为弱变异性,其他养分除呼兰区速效磷变异达103.97%为强变异外,其他养分变异均在10%-100%为中等变异。建成区有机质含量范围为15.4~73.3g·kg-1,平均值为45.6g·kg-1,变异幅度为21.23%~69.56%。有机质和全氮、速效钾呈极显著正相关,有机质和全钾、pH呈负相关性但不显著。建成区土壤碱解氮含量较为适中,有效磷、速效钾含量较高。 The paper analyses the variability of SOM and pH values and the content's relativity among the nutrients. The paper applied the GIS software to drew the map of samples' distribution and applied SPSS12 to analyze the data's correlation. The result showed that the urban soil is alkalescent on the whole, the pH value has a increasing tendency from soil in grassland, forest land and roadside. The variability of urban soil pH are all less than 10%. Other nutrient variability are ranging from 10% to 100% except for available phosphorus which reaches 103.97% of Hulan district. The content of SOM content in urban area range from 15.4-73.3 g. kg-1, the average value is 45.6 g- kg1, and variability are ranging from 21.23%- 69.56%. SOM has a significant positive correlation with total N and available K, and took negative correlation with total K and pHo The content of available N is medium, but the content of available P and K is high.
出处 《东北农业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期120-125,共6页 Journal of Northeast Agricultural University
基金 中国与联合国开发计划署绿色发展项目(CPR/06/209-07) 哈尔滨科技创新人才基金项目(2011RFQYN064) 2011年黑龙江省农业科学院科技创新工程项目
关键词 城市土壤 城市建成区 变异分析 urban soil urban built-up area variation analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献59

共引文献451

同被引文献20

  • 1郑纪勇,邵明安,张兴昌.黄土区坡面表层土壤容重和饱和导水率空间变异特征[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(3):53-56. 被引量:246
  • 2李晓燕,张树文,王宗明,张惠琳.吉林省德惠市土壤特性空间变异特征与格局[J].地理学报,2004,59(6):989-997. 被引量:45
  • 3胡伟,邵明安,王全九.黄土高原退耕坡地土壤水分空间变异性研究[J].水科学进展,2006,17(1):74-81. 被引量:83
  • 4An S, Zheng F, Zhang F, et al. Soil quality degradation processes along a deforestation chronosequence in the Ziwuling area, China [J]. Catena, 2008,75: 248-256.
  • 5Solomon D, Lehmann J, Kinyangi J, et al. Ngoze, anthropogenic perturbations on dynamics and speciation of organic carbon in tropical forest and subtropical grassland ecosystems[J]. Global Change Biology, 2008, 13:511-530.
  • 6Kinyangi J. Soil degradation, thresholds and dynamics of long- term cultivation: From landscape biogeochemistry to nanoscale biogeocomplexity[D]. Ithaca NY: Comell University, 2008: 47-50.
  • 7Locatelli B, Vignola R. Managing watershed services of tropical forests andplantations: Can meta-analysis help[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 258: 1864-1870.
  • 8Brttijnzeel L A. Hydrological functions of tropical forests: Not seeing the soil for the trees[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2004,104(1): 185-228.
  • 9Gao Y, Zhong B L, Yue H, et al. A degradation threshold for irre-versible loss of soil productivity: A long-term case study in China[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 48:1145-1154.
  • 10Davis J M, Baxter C V, Rosi-Marshall E J, et. al. Anticipating stream ecosystem responses to climate change: Toward predic- tions that incorporate effects via land-water linkages[J]. Eco- systems, 2013, 16: 909-922.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部