期刊文献+

《鹿特丹规则》之准据法适用问题——以管辖条款为视角

Analysis of the application of the Rotterdam Rules——from the prospective of jurisdiction clause
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由《鹿特丹规则》管辖条款入手并以之为视角,从适用过程中的内在法律逻辑矛盾和与其他国际公约在适用范围方面立法惯例的外部冲突两方面,分析《鹿特丹规则》作为准据法适用时所可能遇到的问题,进而分别从非缔约国、联合国国际贸易法委员会和中国的立场出发,提出针对这一问题的相应对策。 Based on the review of the jurisdiction clause in the Rotterdam Rules, from the aspects of legal logical contradiction during the application process and the conflict of legislation practice with other international conventions on the scope of ap- plication, the author probes the problem which the Rotterdam Rules may confront with when applied as a proper law, puts for- ward the corresponding countermeasures for solving the problem from the standpoints of non-contracting parties, UNCITRAL and China resnectivelv.
出处 《中国海商法研究》 CSSCI 2013年第2期8-13,共6页 Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
关键词 《鹿特丹规则》 准据法 管辖条款 国际私法 冲突法 the Rotterdam Rules proper law jurisdiction clause private international law conflict law
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1OSBORNE M J, RUBINSTEIN A. A course in game theory [ M ]. Cambridge :The MIT Press, 1994 : 14-15.
  • 2STIMSON E S. Conflict of laws[ M]. New York:Dennis & Co. ,ING,1963.
  • 3BRILMAYER L, GOLDSMITH J. Conflict of laws : cases and materials [ M ]. Beijing: Citic Publishing House,2003.
  • 4MARSHAIL F W. Popular guide to modem legal principles[ M]. New York:Wm. H. Wise & Co. 1957:90.
  • 5莫里斯·克莱因.数学:确定性的丧失[M].李宏魁,译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2001:221.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部