CIF合同下卖方书面文件违约补救措施探讨——英国海商法和《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》对比研究

下载PDF

导出

摘要英国海商法规定的卖方书面文件违约与《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》的规定有很大不同。由于海商货物贸易的特点,卖方提供的书面文件是否构成违约有重大意义。英国海商法对这种违约方式作了详细规定,而《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》未对这种违约方式未作明显区分。

作者梁文琼

机构地区中国政法大学国际法学院

出处《现代商贸工业》 2013年第15期70-71,共2页 Modern Business Trade Industry

关键词英国法违约补救措施

参考文献8

1Alastair C. L. Mullis, Termination for Breach of Contract in C. I.F. Contracts Under the Vienna Convention and English Law; IsThere a Substantial Difference [ M]. Published in Lomnicka /Morse ed. , Contemporary Issues in Commercial Law (Essays inhonor of Prof. A. G. Guest). London: Sweet Maxwell, 1997.
2M. Bridge. International Private Commodity Sales[J]. CanadianBusiness,Law Journal, 1991.
3Indira Carr. International Trade Law, 4th edn[M]. Oxon: Rout-ledge-Cavendish,2010.
4Michael G Bridge. Stipulated Method of Performance Impossible[Jj. Benjamin^ Sale of Goods, 8th edn, (London: Sweet &· Max-weU,2010).
5Treitel,Remedies for Breach of Contract[M]_ Oxford: Oxford U-niversity Press, 1988.
6The Buyefs Right to Avoid the Contract In Case Of Non-Confor-ming Goods or Documents [J]. CISG Advisory Council OpinionNo. 5.
7Jacob S. Ziegel,The Remedial Provisions in the Vienna SalesConvention: Some Common Law Perspectives [J]. Published inGalston Smit ed.,International Sales: The United NationsConvention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods · Mat-thew Bender, (1984) ,Ch. 9.
8Michael G Bridge. The Vienna Convention[J], Benjamin^ Sale ofGoods,8th edn· London: Sweet Maxwell,2010.

现代商贸工业

2013年第15期

内容加载中请稍等...