摘要
2012年刑事诉讼法修正时,在原有无罪推定原则前提下,进一步明确了公诉案件中被告人有罪的举证责任由公诉机关承担,同时强调不得强迫任何人证实自己有罪,并规定侦查人员在讯问的时候,应当告知犯罪嫌疑人如实供述自己罪行可以从宽处理的法律规定。从某种意义上说,我国立法实际已确立"沉默权"内容。因此,需要分析被告人"口供"的特点及后果,树立刑事诉讼"证据为王"的观念,在法庭审理中特别要把握若干质证规则。
With the innocent presupposition principle, the Procedure Law amended in 2012 makes it clearer that it is the public prosecution agencies that should take the responsibility of giving evidences in public prosecution cases and emphasizes that anyone should not be compelled to make self-crimination, and stipulates that while conducting interrogation, criminal investigators should tell criminal suspects only when they confess offences truthfully can they be punished leniently. To some extent, there exists the right to keep silent in our legislation. Accordingly, it is necessary to analyze the characteristics and consequences of statements of the accused, to have the notion that evidences are highly important and to grasp the principles concerned in court trial.
关键词
辩称无罪案
质证
原则
Plead for Innocence
Give Evidence
Principle
