期刊文献+

国际关系研究中形式模型的用途与误用

Use and Misuse of Formal Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 形式方法是国际关系研究领域的重要研究工具,尽管其应用并不广泛,但日益显示出扩大的趋势。与此同时,形式方法也面临着各种批评,尤其是来自使用者群体之外的批评。批评者指出模型预测与现实情况相去甚远,而且形式理论更多是在用繁杂的工具完成无足轻重的工作。实际上,形式模型能够推动国际关系理论的建立,但所建立的理论是"远离现实的",理论建立之后还必须进行真实化还原才能够对现实世界做出预测。因此,模型替代和真实化还原构成了形式方法的两个重要步骤。在使用形式方法的过程中,只有加强了这两个方面,尤其是目前不被重视的还原步骤,才有可能避免各式各样的误用。 Formal method is an important research tool in the field of international relations study,and its use is not widespread,but shows a sign of expansion.At the same time,formal methods are facing various kinds of criticism.Critics point out that the model prediction is wide apart from the reality,and it only fulfills unimportant task with complicated tools.In fact,formal model can promote the establishment of theory of international relations,but the theory is 'far away from the reality',which can predict the real world after realistic transformation.Therefore,model simplification and realistic transformation are two key steps of formal methods.In the process of the use of formal method,these two aspects must be strengthened simultaneously,which can avoid various kinds of misuse.
作者 胡文秀 王玮
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期1-6,79,共6页 International Forum
基金 教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关课题"世界主要国家安全体制机制研究"阶段性研究成果之一(项目编号:11JZD046)
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Mark P. Petracca, "The Rational Choice Approach to Politics: A Challenge to Democratic Theory", The Review of Politics, Vol. 53, No. 2. (Spring, 1991), p. 318.
  • 2David Lalman, Joe Oppenheimer, and Piotr Swistak, "Formal Rational Choice Theory: A Cumulative Science of Politics," in Ada W. Finifter, ed., Political Science: State of the Discipline H, Washington: American Political Science As- sociation, 1993, p. 78.
  • 3Stephen M. Walt, "Rigor or rigor mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies," in Michael E. Brown et al., eds., Rational Choice and Security Studies. Stephen Walt and His Critics, London: The MIT Press, 2000, p. 5, pp. 11-18, p. 7, p. 18.
  • 4David M. Levy, How the Dismal Science Got Its Name? Classical Economics and the Ur-Text of Racial Politics, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2001, p. 59.
  • 5Duncan Snidal, "Formal Models of International Politics", in Detlef F. Sprinz and Yael Wolinsky-Nahmias eds, Models, Numbers, and Cases : Methods for Studying International Relations, pp. 227-264.
  • 6Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and James D. Morrow, "Sorting Through the Wealth of Notions," in Michael E. Brown et al. , eds. , Rational Choice and Security Studies: Stephen Walt and His Critics, pp. 45-47.
  • 7Lisa L. Martin, "The Contributions of Rational Choice: A Defense of Pluralism," in Michael E. Brown, et al., eds., Rational Choice and Securit7 Studies: Stephen Walt and His Critics, pp. 64-65.
  • 8Peter Bennett and Michael Nicholson, "Formal methods of analysis in IR," in A. J. R. Groom and Margot Light eds., Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory, NY: Pinter Publishers, 1994, pp. 210-212.
  • 9Stephen M. Walt, "Rigor or rigor mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies," pp. 19-27.
  • 10[美]肯尼思·沃尔兹:《国际政治理论》[M],信强译,上海人民出版社,2003年版,第9页,第9—12页.

二级参考文献35

  • 1安德鲁·肖特著 陆铭 陈钊译 李维森审订.社会制度的经济理论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003第1版..
  • 2曼瑟尔·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:上海三联书店,1995..
  • 3Robert Powell.In the Shadow of Power[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,1999.
  • 4Rebecca B.Morton.Methods and Models[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999.
  • 5马尔科姆·卢瑟福.经济学中的制度:老制度主义和新制度主义[M].陈建波、郁仲莉译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
  • 6Michael Nicholson."Formal Methods in International Relations"[A].in Frank P.Harvey and Michael Brecher eds.,Evaluating Methodology in International Studies[C].Ann Arbor:the University of Michigan Press,2002.
  • 7Gregory N.Derry.What Science Is and How it Works[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,1999.
  • 8谢拉·C.道.经济学方法论[M].杨培雷译.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2005.
  • 9James Morrow.Game Theory for Political Scientist[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,1994.
  • 10Robert Axelrod.The Evolution of Cooperation[M].New York:Basic Books,1984.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部