摘要
采用应对方式问卷和总体幸福感量表对嘉应学院的204名贫困师范生和228名非贫困师范生进行问卷调查,结果表明:(1)贫困师范生与非贫困师范生在应对方式与主观幸福感上存在显著差异;(2)不同性别的贫困师范生在应对方式与主观幸福感上无显著差异,不同专业、年级的贫困师范生在应对方式与主观幸福感上存在显著差异;(3)应对方式中的自责、解决问题、退避这三个变量能较好地预测贫困师范生的主观幸福感水平。
Questionnaire investigation was carried out among 204 poor normal college students and 228 non-poor normal college students of Jiaying University by using coping style questionnaire and general well-being scales, and the results showed that: 1 )There were significant difference between coping style and subjective well-being in poor normal college students and non-poor normal college students; 2) There was no significant difference between coping style and subjective well-being among poor normal college students with different genders; and 3 ) Three variables-self-accusation, problem solving and wince of Coping style can well predict poor normal college students' subjective well-being level.
出处
《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》
CAS
2013年第6期125-130,共6页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金
嘉应学院校级科研项目"高校贫困大学生社会支持
应对方式及主观幸福感的关系研究"(08SK13)成果
广东省普通高校人文社科省市共建重点研究基地嘉应学院客家研究所招标课题"客家妇女社会地位的人格特质影响研究"(10KYKT09)成果
关键词
师范类大学生
贫困大学生
应对方式
主观幸福感
normal college students
poor college students
coping style
subjective well-being