期刊文献+

微信收费之争:观点与问题分析

The Argument of WeChat:Analysis of the View
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以运营商高层为首,要求微信收费,掀起了一场全国性争论。微信收费的理由是牵强的,也是有害的。面对技术的飞速发展与市场需求的快速变化,运营商不是把精力与资源投入到技术创新与业务开拓上,而是试图利用垄断地位与行政力量,压制网络企业的创新。这不但对自身无益,也将阻碍我国移动网络的创新与发展。 WeChat, which is also known as Wei Xin, has developed rapidly since its launching on January 21st, 2011. Its users have reached 300 million up to January 23rd, 2013 and the number is still accelerating. In contrast, the domestic three major telegram operators fail to improve their own traditional SMS and voice services, facing the pain of business transformation. The operators thus press the adjustment of free strategy which WeChat has adopted. After a comprehensive analysis of the views of operators, this paper concludes that it is improper and harmful for operators to do so. Facing the rapid development of technology and the changing demands of the market, the operators should put their energy and resources into technological innovation and business development, instead of suppressing the network enterprises by its monopoly and some executive power. Otherwise, they will suffer from their behaviors in the end and also hinder the innovation and development of China' s technology and economy.
作者 徐兆畅
出处 《广州城市职业学院学报》 2013年第2期18-22,共5页 Journal Of Guangzhou City Polytechnic
关键词 微信 移动网络 运营商 OTT 垄断 创新 WeChat mobile network telegram operator OTF monopoly innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1“微信收费”话题继续发酵运营商和腾讯都煎熬[DB/OL]. [2013 -03 -28] (2013 - 04 - 08). http://news. xinhuanet.com.
  • 2“新华视点”记者.“微信收费”之争:逐垄断小利还是取创新大义[N].中国青年报,2013 - 04 - 05.
  • 3晓雅,晓镜,等.中外运营商2012年财报比较与评析[N].人民邮电报,2013—03—26.
  • 4邱道勇.微信改变世界[M].北京:中国财富出版社,2012:20-90.
  • 5冯颖.《电信法》一漫长的等待[DB/OL].[2011 -11 -01] (2013 - 04 - 09). http : //www. sarft. net.
  • 6工信部.通信产业“十二五”发展规划[DB/OL].[2012 - 05 - 04] (2013 - 04 - 09). http://www. miit. gov. cn.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部