期刊文献+

显性/隐性区分和显性交际的限度

下载PDF
导出
摘要 显性/隐性区分不等于语义/语用区分,而是关于被传达的内容(即说者意义)的划分。基于关联理论的显义/含意之区分可作为一种作出如此基于语用的区分的方法。显性内容的还原很大程度上依赖于语用充实过程,只有这些过程中的某些部分被语言激发,其他部分完全是语用理据性的,通过考察语言交际关系可看出显性是有限度的。
作者 唐韧
出处 《现代语文(下旬.语言研究)》 2013年第5期25-28,共4页 Modern Chinese
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Atlas J. Logic,Meaning,and Conversation[M].{H}Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005.
  • 2Bach K. Conversational impliciture[J].Mind and Language,2001,(09):124-162.
  • 3Blakemore D. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning:the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers[M].{H}Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.
  • 4Camp E. Contextualism,metaphor,and what is said[J].Mind and Language,2006,(03):280-309.
  • 5Cappelen,H,E.Lepore. Insensitive Semantics:A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism[M].{H}Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,2005.
  • 6Carston R. Thoughts and Utterances:The pragmatics of explicit communication[M].{H}Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,2002.
  • 7Carston,R. Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction[A].{H}Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,2004.633-656.
  • 8Grice,H.P. Logic and conversation[A].{H}New York:Academic Press,Inc,1975.41-58.
  • 9Horn,L. The border wars:A neo-Gricean perspective[A].{H}Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,2006.
  • 10King,J,J.Stanley. Semantics,pragmatics,and the role of semantic content[A].{H}Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005.

二级参考文献18

  • 1冉永平.认知语用学的焦点问题探索[J].现代外语,2002,25(1):48-60. 被引量:56
  • 2冉永平.当代语用学的发展趋势[J].现代外语,2005,28(4):403-412. 被引量:44
  • 3GRICE P. Logic and conversation [ M ] //COLE P, MORGAN J. Syntax and Pragmatics 3 : Speech Actsl. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
  • 4CAPPELEN L. Insensitive Semantics [ M ]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
  • 5SPERBER D, WILSON D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition [ M ]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 1986/1995.
  • 6GRICE P. Studies in the way of words [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1989.
  • 7RECANATI F. Literalism and contextualism: Some varieties [ M ] //PREYER G, PETER G. Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning and Truth. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 2005.
  • 8CARSTON R. Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature [ M] //BIANCHI C. The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. California: CSLI publications, 2004.
  • 9RECANATI F. Literal meaning [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • 10RECANATI F. Does linguistic communication rest on inference [J]. Mind and language, 2002 (17).

共引文献174

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部