期刊文献+

地区行政垄断与我国企业出口的“生产率悖论” 被引量:38

Local Administrative Monopoly and the “Productivity Paradox” of Chinese Firms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文选取1998~2006年中国工业企业的微观数据,采用Heckman两阶段选择模型,考察了企业出口的"生产率悖论"。我们发现:我国的外资企业的出口存在明显的"生产率悖论",即外资出口企业的生产率水平显著低于非出口企业,这与新新贸易理论的结论恰好相反。而内资企业的出口行为则符合新新贸易理论的理论预测。在此基础上,我们进一步从地方行政垄断和行业要素密集度的角度,对这一悖论形成的原因进行了分析。实证结果表明:地方性行政垄断对我国外资企业的诸多限制及政策引导,扭曲了企业的出口行为,是形成"生产率悖论"的重要原因。 By using firm level data from 1998 ~ 2006, this paper investigates the “Productivity Paradox” of Chinese Firms. We show that, “Productivity Paradox” exists only for foreign affiliates in China, that is, the exporting firms are rela- tively less productive than the non-exporters, which is in sharp contrast with the conclusion predicted by the new-new trade theory. While the exporting behavior of the domestic firms is quite in accordance with the new-new trade theory. In addition, we offer a plausible explanation from the perspective of local administrative monopoly, which is a stylized fact that commonly exists in Chinese regions. The empirical results imply that, the operation and sale restrictions due to local administrative mo- nopoly strongly distort foreign affiliate firms' exporting behavior, thus have strong explanations power for the “Productivity Par- adox”.
作者 盛丹
出处 《产业经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期70-80,共11页 Industrial Economics Research
基金 国家自然科学基金"中国企业低价出口之谜:基于企业边际成本加成率的研究"(项目编号:71203104)的阶段性成果
关键词 地区行政垄断 生产率悖论 新新贸易理论 企业出口 外商直接投资 local administrative monopoly productivity paradox new new trade theory exporting firms foreigndirect investment
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Bernard, A. ,J. B. Jensen and Lawrence, R. Z. , 1995, Exporters, Jobs and Wages in U. S. Manufacturing : 1976 ~ 1987Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics ,67-119.
  • 2Melitz,M. J. ,2003 ,MThe Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity”,Econometrica,71(6) : 1695-1725.
  • 3Bernard,A. ,J. Eaton,and Jensen,J. B. ,2003 Plants and Productivity in International Trade”,American Economic Re-view ,93:1268一1290.
  • 4Helpman,E.,M.Melitz and Yeaple’S.,2004,“Exports VS FDI with Heterogeneous Firms”,American Economic Review,94:300-316.
  • 5Greenaway,D and Kneller,R. ,2004. “Exporting and Productivity in the United Kingdom”,Oxford Review of EconomicPolicy,20(3) :358-371.
  • 6Bernard,A. B. ,Redding,S. J. and Schott,P. K. ,2006, Multi-Product Firms and Trade Liberalization,Working Paper, 12.
  • 7唐宜红,林发勤.异质性企业贸易模型对中国企业出口的适用性检验[J].南开经济研究,2009(6):88-99. 被引量:70
  • 8李春顶,尹翔硕.我国出口企业的“生产率悖论”及其解释[J].财贸经济,2009,30(11):84-90. 被引量:177
  • 9Westerlund,J. and F. Wilhelmsson,2009,Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data”,Applied Eco-nomics ,1 (9) :1466-1483.
  • 10Heckman,J. J. , 1979,uSample Selection Bias as a Specification Error” , Econometrica,47(1) :153-161.

二级参考文献84

共引文献321

同被引文献572

引证文献38

二级引证文献284

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部