辨证看待中国专利的数量与质量被引量：59

Dialectical Perspective of Patent Quantity and Quality in China

导出

摘要中国发明专利申请受理量2011年达世界第一,引起国内外对于我国专利质量的担忧与质疑。我国专利的数量究竟是多还是少、数量的迅速增加是否必然导致质量下降、中国专利的质量是否值得信任、如何追求有质量的数量?本文在对此进行一一分析的基础上,提出了改进专利质量的相关建议。 The number of patent application for invention in China became the biggest in the world in 2011 This caused the domestic and international concerns and questions about China＇s patent quality. However, is the number of China＇s patent more or less？ Is the rapid increase in number bounded to lead to the decline in the quality？ Whether is Chinese patent quality worthy of trust？ How to pursue the quantitywith quality？ Based on analysis, this paper puts forward the advices improving patent quality.

作者朱雪忠

机构地区同济大学知识产权学院

出处《中国科学院院刊》 2013年第4期435-441,共7页 Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

基金国家社科基金重大项目(12&ZD 073) 国家自然科学基金项目(71273189)

关键词专利数量质量辨证关系 patent, quantity, quality, dialectical perspective

分类号 G306 [文化科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1国家知识产权局规划发展司.我国本国人发明专利年度授权量首次位居世界第二.专利统计简报,2012,(17).
2李明.哈佛专家批评中国专利过于追求数量,新浪科技官方微博,http://www.sina.com.cn2011年1月16日.
3Dan Prud' homme. Dulling the Cutting-Edge: How Patent-Related Policies and Practices Hamper Innovation in China, http://www.europeanchamber.com.cn/upload/ media/mediaJ27/patentstudy2012%5B766%5D.pdf.
4经济学人.中国的专利价值评估,http://www.ecocn.org/article.3355.1.html,2013年1月5日.
5文家春.专利审查行为对技术创新的影响机理研究[J].科学学研究,2012,30(6):848-855. 被引量：28
6国家知识产权局规划发展司.201l中国有效专利年度报告(一).专利统计简报,2012,(11).
7贺延芳.创新管理推动我国专利审查质量持续提升.中国知识产权报,2012年2月10日.
8魏倩.经合组织:过去10年全球主要国家专利质量下降.人民网,2011年11月3日.http://ip.people,tom.cn/GB/16127930.html.
9EveYZhou,BobStembridge.中国专利报告--中国创新活动的现状与未来,http://wenku.baidu.com/view/448b6942336cleb91a375dfd.html.

二级参考文献22

1Jaffe A B, Lerner J. Innovation and Its Discontents [ M ]. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2004.56.
2Burke P F, Reitzig M. Measuring patent assessmentquality: analyzing the degree and kind of (In) consis- tency in patent offices" decision making [ J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(9) : 1404 - 1430.
3Combeau J. Patent Quality [ EB/OL]. Available at www. ficpi, org/library/07 AmsterdamColloqu/5 - Combeau_revised. pdf. 2011 - 06 - 21.
4Paul H J, Alfons, P, Elizabeth W. Misclassification in patent offices [ J]. Intellectual Property Research Insti- tute of Australia Working Paper, 2008, No. 02/08.
5Lemley M A. Rational ignorance at the patent Office [J]. Northeastern University Law Review, 2001, 95 (4) :1495 - 1523.
6Palangkaraya A, Jensen P H,Webster E. Determinants of international patent examination outcomes [ R ]. Intel- lectual Property Research Institute of Australia Working Paper, 2005, No. 09/05.
7Quillen Jr, C D,Webster O H. Continuing patent appli- cations and performance of the U.S. patent office [ J ]. The Federal Circuit Bar Journal, 2001, 11 ( 1 ) : 1 - 21.
8Jensen P H,Webster E M. Factors affecting the power of patent rights [ R]. Melbourne: Intellectual Property Re- search Institute of Australia (IPRIA) , Working Paper, 2004, No. 31/04.
9Gallini N T. The economics of patents: lessons from re- cent U. S. Patent Reform [ J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, 16 ( 2 ) : 131 - 154.
10Gaetan R, Bruno P. On the price elasticity of demand for patents [ J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statis- tics, 2011, 4 May.